Judge: Alison Mackenzie, Case: 23STCV07536, Date: 2023-11-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV07536 Hearing Date: November 9, 2023 Dept: 55
Tentative: Defendant's unopposed demurrer is sustained with leave to amend.The unopposed motion to strike is
granted. Twenty days' leave to amend.
Plaintiff filed an official form Complaint with the Breach of Contract box checked at paragraph 8 and "contractual fraud" written in at paragraph 1. An official form complaint must contain ultimate
facts. People ex rel. Dep't of
Transportation v. Sup. Ct. (1992) 5 Cal. App. 4th 1480, 1484. Also, demurrers
are to be sustained where a pleading fails to plead adequately any essential
element of the cause of action. Cantu
v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 857, 879-80.
Plaintiff’s form Complaint has a
box checked for contract breach, but alleges fraud in connection with a
contract, without alleging all elements of either cause of action. The elements to allege as to a
claim for breach of contract are:
- Existence
of contract;
- plaintiffs’
performance, or excuse for nonperformance;
- defendants’
breach; and
- resulting
damage.
Wall Street Network, Ltd. v.
N. Y. Times Co. (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1171, 1178; Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley
Oil & Gas Co (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1375, 1391 n.6.
The elements of a claim for fraudulent
contract inducement are:
1.
Fraudulent
representation;
2.
to induce contract;
3.
that is not a part of
the contract.
A. A. Baxter Corp. v. Colt Industries, Inc. (1970) 10 Cal. App. 3d 144, 153-54. See
also Scott
v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2013) 214
Cal.App.4th 743, 766 (“allegations of
the second amended complaint are insufficient to state a claim for fraud in the
inducement. Fraud must be pleaded
with specificity…. [Plaintiff] has pleaded in generalities, without identifying
the specific persons who made the misrepresentations, the precise statements
made, or the dates on which they were made.”).
Plaintiff's official form Complaint fails
to attach any page having a cause of action. The Complaint is completely devoid of any allegations supporting any cause of action. Neither Defendant nor the Court should
have to guess as to the cause of action asserted by Plaintiff. Courts generally allow at least
one time to amend a complaint, after sustaining a demurrer, even without any
request for leave to amend. McDonald
v. Sup. Ct. (1986) 180 Cal. App. 3d 297, 303; City of Stockton v. Sup.Ct. (2007) 42
Cal.4th 730, 747; Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ.
Pro. Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) ¶7:129. The Court therefore sustains the demurrer and grants the motion to strike with leave to amend.