Judge: Andrew E. Cooper, Case: 22CHCV00416, Date: 2025-02-24 Tentative Ruling

Counsel wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may inform the clerk or courtroom assisant in North Valley Department F51, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, at (818) 407-2251.  Please be aware that unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If the matter is submitted on the court's tentative ruling by all parties, counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the court's tentative ruling. The tentative ruling may be extracted verbatim by copying and specially pasting, as unformatted text, from the Los Angeles Superior Court’s website, http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org. All hearings on law and motion and other calendar matters are generally NOT transcribed by a court reporter unless one is provided by the party(ies).

Case Number: 22CHCV00416    Hearing Date: February 24, 2025    Dept: F51

Dept. F-51¿ 

Date: 2/24/25 

Case #24CHCV00416

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT

DEPARTMENT F-51

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

Motion filed: 12/5/24 

MOVING ATTORNEY: Adam D. H. Grant (“Counsel”)

CLIENT: Defendant Ferdy Hernandez Sanchez (“Defendant”)

NOTICE: OK

RELIEF REQUESTED: An order relieving Counsel as attorney of record for Defendant.

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted.

In a civil action, an attorney may move to be relieved as counsel at any time during the proceedings after giving notice to his client. (Code Civ. Proc. § 284.) The moving attorney shall file with his motion: (1) a notice of the motion, directed to the client using Judicial Council form MC-051; (2) a declaration in support of the motion using Judicial Council form MC-052; and (3) a proposed order granting the motion; all to be served on the client and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

In his declaration, the moving attorney is required to state “in general terms, and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1).” (Id., subd. (c).) The client must be provided no less than five days’ notice before hearing on the motion. An attorney may withdraw from a case when it can be accomplished without undue prejudice to the client’s interests. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.) On the other hand, if the attorney withdraws at a critical point in the action, thereby prejudicing his client, he has violated his ethical duties. (Ibid.)

Here, Counsel filed this motion to be relieved as counsel for Defendant on 12/5/24. Counsel declares that that the motion and accompanying papers have been mailed to the client’s last known address and electronically served. (Decl. of Adam D. H. Grant ¶ 3b.) Counsel has also served Plaintiff with the instant motion.

Counsel filed an accompanying notice of the motion using Judicial Council form MC-051, a declaration in support of his motion using form MC-052, and a proposed order granting the motion using form MC-053. In the MC-052 declaration, Counsel states that “there has been a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship” such that Counsel must withdraw from the representation of Defendant. (Id. at ¶ 2.) The next hearing date in this action is a case management conference set for the same date as the instant hearing. No trial date has been set. Therefore, Counsel’s withdrawal does not raise the risk of unduly prejudicing his client.

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Counsel has satisfied the statutory requirements for the instant motion to be relieved as counsel. Accordingly, the motion is granted.