Judge: Andrew E. Cooper, Case: 24CHCV01678, Date: 2025-02-06 Tentative Ruling

Counsel wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may inform the clerk or courtroom assisant in North Valley Department F51, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, at (818) 407-2251.  Please be aware that unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If the matter is submitted on the court's tentative ruling by all parties, counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the court's tentative ruling. The tentative ruling may be extracted verbatim by copying and specially pasting, as unformatted text, from the Los Angeles Superior Court’s website, http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org. All hearings on law and motion and other calendar matters are generally NOT transcribed by a court reporter unless one is provided by the party(ies).


Case Number: 24CHCV01678    Hearing Date: February 6, 2025    Dept: F51

Dept. F-51¿ 

Date: 2/6/25 

Case #24CHCV01678

 

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT

DEPARTMENT F-51

 

FEBRUARY 5,2025

 

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

Los Angeles Superior Court Case # 24CHCV01678

 

Motion filed: 10/11/24 

 

MOVING ATTORNEY: Zubin Farinpour (“Counsel”)

CLIENT: Plaintiffs American Solar Solution, Inc.; and Shay Yavor (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)

NOTICE: OK

 

RELIEF REQUESTED: An order relieving Counsel as attorney of record for Plaintiffs.

 

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted.

 

In a civil action, an attorney may move to be relieved as counsel at any time during the proceedings after giving notice to his client. (Code Civ. Proc. § 284.) The moving attorney shall file with his motion: (1) a notice of the motion, directed to the client using Judicial Council form MC-051; (2) a declaration in support of the motion using Judicial Council form MC-052; and (3) a proposed order granting the motion; all to be served on the client and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

 

In his declaration, the moving attorney is required to state “in general terms, and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1).” (Id., subd. (c).) The client must be provided no less than five days’ notice before hearing on the motion. An attorney may withdraw from a case when it can be accomplished without undue prejudice to the client’s interests. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.) On the other hand, if the attorney withdraws at a critical point in the action, thereby prejudicing his client, he has violated his ethical duties. (Ibid.)

 

Here, Counsel filed this motion to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff on 10/11/24. Counsel declares that that the motion and accompanying papers have been mailed to the client’s last known address, as confirmed via text message. (Decl. of Zubin Farinpour 3b(2).) No other parties have appeared in the instant action.

 

Counsel filed an accompanying notice of the motion using Judicial Council form MC-051, a declaration in support of his motion using form MC-052, and a proposed order granting the motion using form MC-053. In the MC-052 declaration, Counsel states that “there has been an irreparable breakdown in the attorney client relationship” such that Counsel must withdraw from the representation of Plaintiffs. (Id. at ¶ 2.) The next hearing date in this action is a case management conference set for 6/2/25. No trial date has been set. Therefore, Counsel’s withdrawal does not raise the risk of unduly prejudicing his clients.

 

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Counsel has satisfied the statutory requirements for the instant motion to be relieved as counsel. Accordingly, the motion is granted.