Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 19STCV43341, Date: 2024-02-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV43341 Hearing Date: February 26, 2024 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a
tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the
withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of
the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING
DATE |
February
26, 2024 |
|
CASE
NUMBER |
19STCV43341 |
|
MOTION |
Motion
to Vacate Dismissal and Enter Judgment |
|
MOVING
PARTY |
Plaintiff
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
|
OPPOSING
PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) moves
to vacate the October 15, 2020 order of dismissal of its complaint without
prejudice. No opposition has been filed.
ANALYSIS
1. Relief
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6
“If
parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties
outside the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of
the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant
to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may
retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until
performance in full of the terms of the settlement.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6.)
On September 29, 2020, the parties
entered into a settlement agreement whereby Defendant Aminta Marroquin
(“Defendant”) agreed to pay $18,185.89 and make monthly payments. (Reese Decl.
¶ 2, Ex. A.) According to the agreement, on October 1, 2020, Defendant’s
insurer would make an initial payment of $6,185.89. Starting on October 1,
2020, Defendant would make monthly payments of $200.00 on the same day of each
month until the settlement amount was paid in full.
Pursuant to the agreement, in the event that Defendant fails to make a
payment, and if a payment is not made to Plaintiff within 14 days of the due
date, Plaintiff is entitled to have any dismissal set aside and judgment
entered for the settlement amount, minus credit for payments received, plus any
costs the court requires and a reasonable attorney fee associated with entering
the judgment not to exceed $500. (Ibid.) Additionally, the court
specifically retains jurisdiction to enforce settlement according to the terms
of the agreement and pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. (Ibid.)
On October 15, 2020, this action was dismissed pursuant to the
stipulation for dismissal.
On December
5, 2023, Plaintiff filed this motion alleging that Defendant defaulted on
payments. According to the Declaration of Harlan Reese, Defendant made monthly
payments totaling $4,900. (Reese Decl. ¶ 4.) Counsel asserts that the total
payments received was $11,085.89. (Reese Decl. ¶ 7.) However, this conflicts
with information in the memorandum, which states that Defendant’s insurer
provided a one-time payment of $11,085.89 and Defendant paid $4,900. (Motion,
2.) Therefore, the amount of payments Plaintiff received is unclear.
At the hearing, Plaintiff shall clarify
the total amount of payments it has received so that the Court can enter
judgment. To the extent that the proposed order must be amended, Plaintiff
shall file an amended proposed order.
CONCLUSION
AND ORDER
Accordingly, the motion to vacate dismissal and enter judgment is conditionally
granted.
Plaintiff shall give notice of the Court’s order and file a proof of
service of such.