Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 21STCV04645, Date: 2024-02-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV04645 Hearing Date: February 5, 2024 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
February
5, 2024 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
21STCV04645 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Compel
Responses to Request for Production of Documents |
|
Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
Unopposed |
BACKGROUND
Defendant Uber Technologies,
Inc. (“Defendant”) moves to compel Plaintiff Prince Nortey’s (“Plaintiff”)
responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One. No opposition has
been filed.
LEGAL
STANDARD
Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031.300, if a party fails to
serve a timely response to a demand for inspection, the party making the demand
may move for an order compelling response to the demand. (Code Civ. Pro §
2031.300 (b).) The party who fails to serve a timely response to a demand for
inspection waives any objection to the demand unless the court finds that the
party has subsequently served a response that is in substantial compliance or
party’s failure was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
(Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300 (a)(1)- (2).)
Courts shall impose a monetary sanction against any party who
unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to a demand for
inspection unless the party acted with substantial justification or other
circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. (Code Civ. Proc. §
2031.300 (c).) Further, “[t]he court may award sanctions under the Discovery
Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though no
opposition to the motion was filed, or opposition to the motion was withdrawn,
or the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion
was filed.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1348(a).)
DISCUSSION
Defendant served Request for
Production of Documents, Set One on Plaintiff on August 3, 2023. (Walshok Decl.
¶ 3, Exh. 1.) The responses were due September 5, 2023. (Id. ¶ 4.) Since then,
no responses have been served. (Id.) Because responses have not been served,
the motion to compel is granted.
Defendant also requests $1,457.50 in
monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and his attorney. This represents an
hourly rate of $200 and the $60 filing fee. The Court finds sanctions are
warranted because Plaintiff has failed to respond. However, the amount
requested is excessive due to the type of motions at issue and the fact no
opposition was filed. Therefore, the Court awards sanctions in the amount of $360.00
(1.5 hours of attorney time to file and appear at the hearing, plus the $60
filing fee).
CONCLUSION
AND ORDER
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Compel Request for Production of
Documents, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff Prince Nortey shall provide verified
responses, without objection, within 15 days.
The Court awards monetary sanctions to Defendant against Plaintiff and
his attorney of record, jointly and severally, in the reduced amount of $360.00.
Said monetary sanctions are to be paid to counsel for Defendant within 30 days
of the date of this order.
Defendant
to provide notice and file a proof of service of such.