Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 21STCV24879, Date: 2023-09-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV24879 Hearing Date: September 29, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
September
29, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
21STCV24879 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Motion
to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Supplemental Requests for Documents |
|
Defendant King’s Seafood Company, LLC |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
Unopposed (Plaintiff Nancy Rika Dawson) |
BACKGROUND
On July 6, 2021, Plaintiff Nancy
Rika Dawson (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant King’s Seafood
Company, LLC (“Defendant”) for negligence. On August 3, 2023, Defendant moved
to compel verified responses to supplemental requests for production of
documents. Defendant also seeks monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and
Plaintiff’s counsel in the amount of $460. This motion is unopposed.
LEGAL
STANDARD
Where
there has been no timely response to a demand for the production of documents,
the demanding party may seek an order compelling a response. (Code Civ. Proc. §
2031.300, subd. (b).) Failure to timely respond waives all objections,
including privilege and work product. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300, subd. (a).)
Thus, unless the party to whom the demand was directed obtains relief from
waiver, he or she cannot raise objections to the documents demanded. There is
no deadline for a motion to compel responses. Likewise, for failure to respond,
the moving party need not attempt to resolve the matter outside court before
filing the motion.¿
Sanctions are mandatory in connection with motions to
compel responses to requests for production of documents against any party,
person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel
unless the court “finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with
substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of
the sanction unjust.”¿(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300(c)).)¿
DISCUSSION
A.
Motion to Compel Responses
On October 26, 2022, Defendant served
supplemental requests for production of documents on Plaintiff. (Kim Decl. ¶ 3.)
To date, no responses have been received. (Kim Decl. ¶ 7.) Accordingly, the
Court grants the motion to compel verified responses without objection. Responses are due within 30 days.
B.
Sanctions
Additionally, Defendant also seeks
monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel. Because Plaintiff
has not opposed the motion, the Court has no information regarding whether
there is substantial justification for the failure to respond, or whether
imposition of sanctions would otherwise be unjust.
Defendant requests $460 in
sanctions, consisting of attorney’s fees in filing the motion and the motion
filing fee. The Court finds the amount requested to be reasonable and awards
attorney’s fees in the amount of $460.
CONCLUSION AND
ORDER
Therefore, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel responses to
supplemental requests for production and orders Plaintiff to provide verified
responses without objection within 30 days.
The Court orders Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff to pay jointly and
severally monetary sanctions in the amount of $460 to counsel for Defendant.
Defendant shall give notice of the Court’s order and file a proof of
service of such.