Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV00913, Date: 2023-08-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV00913 Hearing Date: August 14, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
August
14, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
22STCV00913 |
|
MOTIONS |
Motions
to be Relieved as Counsel |
|
MOVING PARTIES |
Ronald
L. Goldszer, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTIONS
Ronald L. Goldszer, Esq. (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel
for Plaintiffs Brittany Chatmon and Dawn Davis (“Plaintiffs”).
ANALYSIS
Counsel has filed forms MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053. (Cal Rules of
Court, rule 3.1362.) The basis for the
motions are a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. This is a valid reason for withdrawal. (See Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.16.)
However, the dates for the upcoming hearings are incorrect. Further,
there are no proofs of service on all parties. The proofs of service only show
service on Plaintiffs. Lastly, MC-052 for Brittany Chatmon states that the
client’s last known address was confirmed, but also states that it Counsel has
been unable to confirm it. Thus, the motions are DENIED as procedurally
defective
.
CONCLUSION
AND ORDER
Therefore, the Court denies the motions without prejudice.
Counsel shall give notice of the Court’s orders, and file a proof of
service of such.