Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV00913, Date: 2023-08-14 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV00913    Hearing Date: August 14, 2023    Dept: 32

PLEASE NOTE:   Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.  If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit.  The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.  If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely.  Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. 

 

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

DEPARTMENT

32

HEARING DATE

August 14, 2023

CASE NUMBER

22STCV00913

MOTIONS

Motions to be Relieved as Counsel

MOVING PARTIES

Ronald L. Goldszer, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs

OPPOSING PARTY

None

 

MOTIONS

 

Ronald L. Goldszer, Esq. (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiffs Brittany Chatmon and Dawn Davis (“Plaintiffs”). 

 

ANALYSIS

 

Counsel has filed forms MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053. (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)  The basis for the motions are a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.  This is a valid reason for withdrawal.  (See Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.16.) 

 

However, the dates for the upcoming hearings are incorrect. Further, there are no proofs of service on all parties. The proofs of service only show service on Plaintiffs. Lastly, MC-052 for Brittany Chatmon states that the client’s last known address was confirmed, but also states that it Counsel has been unable to confirm it. Thus, the motions are DENIED as procedurally defective

.

 

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

 

Therefore, the Court denies the motions without prejudice.

 

Counsel shall give notice of the Court’s orders, and file a proof of service of such.