Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV20016, Date: 2024-08-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV20016 Hearing Date: August 19, 2024 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
August
19, 2024 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
22STCV20016 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Petition
for Expedited Minors Compromise |
|
Petitioner Daria Lukonina |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
Unopposed
|
The Court has reviewed the Expedited
Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor filed on July 16, 2024 by Petitioner Daria
Lukonina (Petitioner) on behalf
of Claimant Yaroslava Voronkov, age 4. The Court does not approve and denies the
petition based on the following reasons:
As an initial matter,
Petitioner is the appointed guardian ad litem.
Petitioner claims $3,688 in
medical expenses to be reimbursed but does not show who will receive the
reimbursement in item 13. Since Petitioner asserts no expenses were paid by
Medicare or Medi-Cal, then Petitioner must mark/complete 13d–g (whichever are
applicable). Attachment 8 appears to suggest that the reimbursement will be
paid to The Rawlings Company LLC. If the reimbursement will be paid to a health
insurance plan, Petitioner must complete item 13d.
Petitioner must include attachment 13a identifying each
medical expense payer and the amount each paid, and explaining any differences
in items 13a(1), (4), and (5).
Petitioner request $2,000 in
attorney fees which represents 20% of the gross settlement. However,
Petitioner must include an attorney declaration explaining the basis for the
request and describing the factors in California Rules of Court, rule 7.955(b)
and a copy of the fee agreement in attachment 14a.
Petitioner must include
attachment 18a.
Petitioner cannot mark both
19a and 19b. If there is no guardianship of the estate (unrelated to a guardian
ad litem), then a subsection in 19b should be selected, along with any
applicable attachment requested on the form.
Petitioner must complete and
file a proposed order (MC-351) and, if a blocked account is sought in 19b2, an
order for blocked account (MC-355).
Moving party is ordered to give
notice.