Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV24157, Date: 2024-01-30 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV24157    Hearing Date: January 30, 2024    Dept: 32

PLEASE NOTE:   Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.  If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit.  The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.  If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely.  Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. 

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

DEPT:

32

HEARING DATE:

January 30, 2024

CASE NUMBER:

22STCV24157

MOTIONS: 

Petition for Minors Compromise

MOVING PARTY:

Petitioner Ika Sugiharto

OPPOSING PARTY:

Unopposed

 

 

The Court has reviewed the revised Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor, Bradley Sugiharto, age 17. The Court denies the petition without prejudice for the following reasons.

 

Petitioner indicates that Claimant is fully recovered. However, Petitioner must submit medical records and/or a report verifying Claimant’s current condition in attachment 8.

 

Medical expenses are sought to be reimbursed for $8,399.93. Of this amount, Petitioner will be reimbursed $189.95. Claimant’s private insurance will be reimbursed $2,360.77, along with various providers for $6,039.16. However, these amounts total $8,589.88, and thus are inconsistent with the value in 12a(4). The amounts must be amended accordingly. Additionally, the $189.95 that Petitioner purportedly seeks reimbursement for is not indicated in item 8 of the Order (MC-351) or item 14b of the Petition.

 

Accordingly, the Court denies the petition without prejudice.

 

Petitioner shall give notice and file a proof of service of such.