Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV27495, Date: 2023-08-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV27495 Hearing Date: August 24, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
22STCV27495 |
|
MOTION |
Expedited Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise |
|
MOVING PARTY |
Petitioner Eduardo Hernandez |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
On August 16, 2023, the Court issued a minute order denying the expedited
application to approve minor’s compromise as to Edilson Hernandez, age 13, for
the following reasons:
·
Petitioner
failed to provide sufficient evidence supporting the agreed amount ($2000.00)
in full satisfaction of the lien claim listed in 13(f)(2). Petitioner advanced
Attachment 13(g), which indicated the full amount ($2870.00) needed to satisfy
the lien claim. The numbers do not match.
·
Petitioner
advanced Attachment 19(b)(2) as a proposed order approving compromise. However,
the settlement amount proposed to be deposited into the blocked account is
unsupported. The proposed gross settlement for the claimant is $13,000, the
expected net settlement is $8010.99, but the amount listed is $8400.00.
The Court noted the prior set hearing remains on calendar.
No amended documents have been filed. Accordingly, the Court denies the
petition without prejudice.
Petitioner shall give notice of the Court’s order and file a proof of
service of such.