Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV32310, Date: 2023-10-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV32310 Hearing Date: October 24, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
October
24, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
22STCV32310 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Motion
for Order Setting a Status Conference Re: Amendment to Plaintiff’s Complaint |
|
Defendant Walmart, Inc. |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
None
|
BACKGROUND
Defendant Walmart, Inc. (Defendant) moves for an order setting a
status conference. On October 3, 2022, Plaintiff Willie Joyce Taylor
(Plaintiff) filed a complaint against Defendant for negligence and premises
liability.
On January 9, 2023, Defendant was informed that Plaintiff passed away
on November 13, 2022. At the time of filing this motion, no
successor-in-interest had been identified to continue Plaintiff’s action. Defendant
moves to set a status conference regarding whether a successor-in-interest will
continue Plaintiff’s action.
LEGAL
STANDARD
California Code
of Civil Procedure section 377.31 provides that, on motion, the decedent’s
personal representative or, if none, the decedent’s successor in interest may
continue a decedent’s pending action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.30; see Adams
v. Superior Court (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 71, 78-79.) A successor in
interest is the beneficiary of the decedent’s estate or other successor in
interest who succeeds to a cause of action or to a particular item of the
property that is the subject of the cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., §
377.11.) Section 377.33 provides that the court in which an action is continued
may make any order concerning parties that is appropriate to ensure proper
administration of justice, including the appointment of the decedent’s
successor in interest as a special administrator or guardian ad litem.
Section 377.32
provides that a person who seeks to commence such an action as the decedent’s
successor in interest must file an affidavit or declaration providing certain
information, including the decedent’s name, date and place of decedent’s death,
and statements regarding whether the estate has been administered and that the
affiant or declarant is the successor in interest on decedent’s claim. (Id.,
§ 377.32(a).) A certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate must also be
attached to the affidavit or declaration. (Id., § 377.32(c).)¿
ANALYSIS
The Court notes that on August 14, 2023, five declarations were filed by
Douglas Compton, Georgia Compton, Genikwa Seward, Stanley Seward, and Nika
Seward, pursuant to section 377.32. The Declarants assert they are the
successors-in-interest to Plaintiff. However, no motion has been made pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure section 377.31.
CONCLUSION
AND ORDER
To the extent the individuals wish to be heard, they may appear at the
hearing on this motion for order setting a status conference. The Court denies
the request to set a further hearing date.
The Court orders any motion to
continue the proceeding, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 377.31 or
other statute, to be filed and served within 45 days of notice of the Court’s
order.
Defendant shall provide notice of the Court’s order to the individuals
who have filed declarations and file a proof of service of such.