Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 22STCV36598, Date: 2024-07-12 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV36598 Hearing Date: July 12, 2024 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
July
12, 2024 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
22STCV36598 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Petition
for Minors Compromise |
|
Petitioner Jennifer Gardner |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
Unopposed
|
The Court has reviewed the petition
filed on June 17, 2024 by Petitioner Jennifer Gardner (Petitioner) on behalf of
Claimant Amani Bleu Taylor, age 6.
The Court denies the petition without prejudice for the following reasons:
According to the Court’s docket, Petitioner has not been
appointed guardian ad litem for Claimant. The Court notes that the Application
filed April 19, 2024 was denied.
Therefore, the Court will not grant a petition filed by Petitioner until
she is appointed guardian ad litem.[1]
In the event Petitioner is appointed in the future, the
Court observes the following defects in the instant petition.
Petitioner must complete item 10c or mark the agreement
in attachment 11(b)6 as attachment 10c.
Item 11b must be marked. The values in 11b(5) must equal
the value in 11b(1).
Petitioner must provide attachment 11b3 and 11b(6).
Petitioner has put conflicting gross settlement amounts
in item 10a and 16a: these values should be equal. Petitioner can include an
attachment to explain the discrepancies.
Items 12a(2) and 12a(5) must be completed.
The response in 12b(5)(a)(i) conflicts with 12b(5)(b),
showing several medical liens. Petitioner should mark and complete
12b(5)(a)(ii) instead.
Petitioner must make sure the medical liens add up to the
total amount sought to be reimbursed in medical expenses.
Petitioner requests $277,000.42 in attorney fees. It is
unclear what percentage of the gross settlement this represents since the gross
settlement amount is unclear.
Petitioner must provide an attorney declaration in
attachment 13a.
Petitioner selects 18a, however there is no evidence that
there is a guardian of the estate of the minor (which if different from a
guardian ad litem). If this is true, then Petitioner must make a selection in
item 18b.
Accordingly, the Court denies the petition without
prejudice.
Petitioner shall give notice and file a
proof of service of such.
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the
Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent
authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the
tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPT: |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE: |
July
12, 2024 |
|
CASE NUMBER: |
22STCV36598 |
|
MOTIONS: |
Petition
for Minors Compromise |
|
MOVING PARTY: |
Petitioner
April Briggs |
|
OPPOSING PARTY: |
Unopposed
|
The Court has reviewed the petition
filed on June 17, 2024 by Petitioner April Briggs (Petitioner) on behalf of
Claimant Tiara Lovely Briggs, age 16. The Court denies the petition without prejudice for the following
reasons:
According to the Court’s docket, Petitioner has not been
appointed guardian ad litem for Claimant. The Court notes that the Application
filed April 19, 2024 was denied.
Therefore, the Court will not grant a petition filed by Petitioner until
she is appointed guardian ad litem.[2]
In the event Petitioner is appointed in the future, the
Court observes the following defects in the instant petition.
Petitioner must complete item 10c or mark the agreement
in attachment 11(b)6 as attachment 10c.
Item 11b must be marked. The values in 11b(5) must equal
the value in 11b(1).
Petitioner must provide attachment 11b3 and 11b(6).
Petitioner has put conflicting gross settlement amounts
in item 10a and 16a: these values should be equal. Petitioner can include an
attachment to explain the discrepancies.
Items 12a(2) and 12a(5) must be completed.
The response in 12b(5)(a)(i) conflicts with 12b(5)(b),
showing several medical liens. Petitioner should mark and complete
12b(5)(a)(ii) instead.
Petitioner must make sure the medical liens add up to the
total amount sought to be reimbursed in medical expenses.
Petitioner requests $277,000.42 in attorney fees. It is
unclear what percentage of the gross settlement this represents since the gross
settlement amount is unclear.
Petitioner must provide an attorney declaration in
attachment 13a.
Petitioner selects 18a, however there is no evidence that
there is a guardian of the estate of the minor (which if different from a
guardian ad litem). If this is true, then Petitioner must make a selection in
item 18b.
Accordingly, the Court denies the petition without
prejudice.
Petitioner shall give notice and file a
proof of service of such.
[1] Moreover,
it does not appear that Claimant is a named party in the complaint or has been
appointed as a successor in interest; this appears to be why the Application to
Appoint a Guardian ad Litem was rejected. (See Notice of rejection filed
4/19/24.)
[2] As with
the other petition, Petitioner asserts Claimant is the child of
Plaintiff/decedent T.L. Jackson, but is not a named party in the complaint.