Judge: Anne Hwang, Case: 23STCV24266, Date: 2024-05-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV24266 Hearing Date: May 28, 2024 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely. Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
| DEPT: | 32 |
| HEARING DATE: | May 28, 2024 |
| CASE NUMBER: | 23STCV24266 |
| MOTIONS: | Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One |
| Defendant Camille Rubin | |
| OPPOSING PARTY: | Plaintiff Blake Selmon |
BACKGROUND
Defendant Camille Rubin (“Defendant”) moves to compel further responses from Plaintiff Blake Selmon (“Plaintiff”) to Special Interrogatories, Set One. Defendant also seeks monetary sanctions. Plaintiff opposes and Defendant replies.
ANALYSIS
The Court’s Eighth Amended Standing Order for Procedures in the Personal Injury Hub requires counsel to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) before the Court will hear any motion to compel further responses to discovery, and provides that PI Hub Courts may deny or continue any motion if parties fail to schedule and complete an IDC before the scheduled hearing. There is no indication in the record that Plaintiff filed an IDC statement with the Court or scheduled an IDC for this motion. As a result, no IDC has taken place.
The Court therefore continues the motion.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Therefore, the Court continues the motion to July 23, 2024, at 01:30 p.m. Defendant shall scheduled and complete an IDC promptly in order for the motion to be heard.
Defendant is ordered to provide notice of the Court’s orders and file a proof of service of such.