Judge: Anne Richardson, Case: 22STCV10441, Date: 2024-01-09 Tentative Ruling

DEPARTMENT 40 - JUDGE ANNE RICHARDSON - LAW AND MOTION RULINGS
The Court issues tentative rulings on certain motions.The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) email Dept 40 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (smcdept40@lacourt.org) with a copy to the other party(ies) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no email is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. 




Case Number: 22STCV10441    Hearing Date: January 9, 2024    Dept: 40

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 40

 

JOHN VILLANUEVA JR., an individual,

                        Plaintiff,

            v.

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

                        Defendants.

 Case No.:          22STCV10441

 Hearing Date:   1/9/24

 Trial Date:        1/23/24

 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE:

Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition

 

Background

Plaintiff John Villanueva Jr. sues Defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10 pursuant to a March 25, 2022 Complaint alleging three Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (lemon law) claims: breach of express warranty; breach of implied warranty; and failure to commence repairs within a reasonable time.

The claims arise from allegations that on July 10, 2021, Plaintiff leased a new 2021 Volkswagen ID4 (Vehicle), that Volkswagen warranted the Vehicle and agreed to preserve or maintain the utility or performance of Plaintiff’s vehicle or to provide compensation if there was a failure in such utility or performance, and that the Vehicle was delivered to Plaintiff with serious defects and nonconformities to warranty and developed other serious defects and nonconformities to warranty including, but not limited to, electrical and suspension system defects, which Volkswagen’s authorized repair facilities were not able to conform within a reasonable number of attempts.

On October 26, 2023, Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition within 15 days or on a date that the Court otherwise deems appropriate. No opposition has been filed. A facially valid proof of service was attached to the motion.

Volkswagen’s motion is now before the Court.

 

Motion to Compel Deposition: DENIED

Discovery Cut-Offs

Trial in this action is set for January 23, 2024. The corresponding cutoffs for discovery and discovery motions, therefore, were December 24, 2023 and January 8, 2024, respectively. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.020, subd. (a).) The instant motion, however, is set to be heard after the statutory cutoff for discovery and discovery motions. 

 

The Court cannot grant discovery motions after the cutoff date unless the moving party has moved under Code of Civil Procedure section 2024.050 to have the motions heard closer to the trial date. (Pelton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. Delta Packaging Products, Inc. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1568, 1586-1587.) The Court’s discretion in allowing the motions to be heard closer to the trial date than allowed by Code of Civil Procedure section 2024.020 is bounded by the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 2024.050, which include submission of a meet and confer declaration and the trial court’s consideration of the statutory factors. (Ibid.)

 

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.   

Conclusion

Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Deposition is DENIED.