Judge: Armen Tamzarian, Case: 21STCV45961, Date: 2023-03-07 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV45961    Hearing Date: March 7, 2023    Dept: 52

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Motions to: (1) Compel Defendant Veronica Sims to Respond to Demand for production of Documents, (2) Compel Defendant Barry Reed to Respond to Demand for Production of Documents, (3) Deem Request for Admissions to Veronica Sims Admitted, and (4) Deem Request for Admissions to Barry Reed Admitted

(1 & 2) Demands for Production of Documents

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company moves to compel defendant Veronica Sims and Barry Reed to serve responses to demand for production of documents (set one).  When a party fails to timely respond to demands for inspection, the requesting party may move for an order compelling responses.  (2031.300(b).)  Failure to timely respond waives any objections.  (CCP § 2031.300(a).)

Plaintiff served its demands for production of documents (set one) on defendants Sims and Reed on October 12, 2022.  (Randall Decls., ¶¶ 2.A, 3.)  Neither Sims nor Reed served verified responses as of December 12, 2022, when plaintiff filed these motions.  (Id., ¶ 4.)  Plaintiff is therefore entitled to orders compelling each defendant to respond without objections. 

(3 & 4) Requests for Admissions

            Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company moves for orders deeming the truth of matters specified in request for admissions (set one) to defendants Veronica Sims and Barry Reed.  When a party fails to respond to requests for admission, the requesting party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted.  (CCP § 2033.280(b).)  Failure to timely respond to requests for admission also waives any objection.  (CCP § 2033.280(a).)  An order deeming matters admitted is mandatory “unless [the court] finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220.”  (CCP § 2033.280(c).) 

Plaintiff served its requests for admission (set one) on defendants Sims and Reed on October 12, 2022.  (Randall Decls., ¶¶ 2.A, 3.)  Neither Sims nor Reed served verified responses as of December 12, 2022, when plaintiff filed these motions.  (Id., ¶ 4.)  Plaintiff is therefore entitled to orders deeming admitted the truth of the matters specified in its requests for admission (set one) to each defendant.

Sanctions

            On each of its four motions, plaintiff moves for $920 in sanctions against defendants.  For the two motions to compel responses to demands for production of documents, defendants misused the discovery process by “[f]ailing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery.”  (CCP § 2023.010(d).)  That misuse of the discovery process is subject to monetary sanctions.  (CCP § 2023.030(a).)

For the two motions to deem matters admitted, sanctions are mandatory.  “It is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction … on the party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to requests for admission necessitated this motion.”  (CCP § 2033.280(c).)  Sims’ and Reed’s failure to serve timely responses to plaintiff’s requests for admission necessitated this motion. 

The court finds, however, that plaintiffs did not reasonably incur $920 in expenses on each motion.  Plaintiff seeks fees for 2 hours spent preparing each motion and 2 hours spent attending the hearing on each motion.  (Randall Decls., ¶¶ 6-7.)  These simple and duplicative motions did not reasonably require 2 hours of work each.  Attending this combined hearing on the four motions did not reasonably require 2 hours for each motion (i.e., a total of 8 hours).  The court will award only 2 hours of fees at $215 hourly on each motion, plus the $60 filing fee, for a total of $490 in sanctions on each motion.

Disposition

            Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion to compel responses to demand for production of documents (set one) to defendant Veronica Sims is granted.  Defendant Veronica Sims is ordered to serve verified responses without objections to demand for production of documents (set one) within 30 days.  Defendant Veronica Sims is ordered to pay plaintiff $490 in sanctions within 30 days.

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion to compel responses to demand for production of documents (set one) to defendant Barry Reed is granted.  Defendant Barry Reed is ordered to serve verified responses without objections to demand for production of documents (set one) within 30 days.  Defendant Barry Reed is ordered to pay plaintiff $490 in sanctions within 30 days.

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion to deem admitted the matters specified in request for admissions (set one) to defendant Veronica Sims is granted.  The truth of the matters specified in plaintiff’s request for admissions (set one) to Veronica Sims is hereby deemed admitted.  Defendant Veronica Sims is ordered to plaintiff $490 in sanctions within 30 days.

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion to deem admitted the matters specified in request for admissions (set one) to defendant Barry Reed is granted.  The truth of the matters specified in plaintiff’s request for admissions (set one) to Barry Reed is hereby deemed admitted.  Defendant Barry Reed is ordered to plaintiff $490 in sanctions within 30 days.