Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 18STCV08809, Date: 2022-09-19 Tentative Ruling



 
 
 
 
 


Case Number: 18STCV08809    Hearing Date: September 19, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

PARI SHAYGAN,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

MARK ARMSTRONG, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 18STCV08809

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

September 19, 2022

 

Plaintiff Pari Shaygan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Mark Armstrong (“Defendant”) for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.  Trial is currently set for September 21, 2022. 

 

Defendant now moves to continue the current trial date to February 15, 2023.  No opposition has been received. 

 

Although continuances of trials are disfavored, each request for a continuance must be considered on its own merits.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c).)  The Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing of good cause requiring the continuance.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c).) The Court may look to the following factors in determining whether a trial continuance is warranted:  (1) proximity of the trial date; (2) whether there was any previous continuance of trial due to any party; (3) the length of the continuance requested; (4) the availability of alternative means to address the problem that gave rise to the motion; (5) the prejudice that parties or witnesses will suffer as a result of the continuance; and (6) whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial.  (See generally, CRC Rule 3.1332(d)(1)-(11).)  Additional factors for the Court to consider include: a party’s excused inability to obtain essential testimony, documents, or other material evidence despite diligent efforts; whether all parties have stipulated to a continuance; and any other fact or circumstance relevant to the fair determination of the motion or application.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c), (d).)

 

Here, Defendant avers there is good cause for a continuance because the parties have recently agreed to private mediation, but the mediator is not available until November 10, 2022.  Defendant avers the parties have agreed to the requested continuance, and that discovery is to remain closed.  (Mot. Exh. A.)  The motion is unopposed, and Defendant establishes good cause for the continuance. 

 

Defendant’s motion to continue trial is granted.  The September 21, 2022 trial date is continued to ______________ at 8:30 a.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse.  A Final Status Conference is set for _______________ at 10:00 a.m. in Department 31. 

 

Defendant is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 19th day of September 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court