Judge Audra Mori, Case 19STCV07958 2022-08-17 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 19STCV07958, Date: 2022-08-17 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 19STCV07958 Hearing Date: August 17, 2022 Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

RODNEY JORDAN,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

MOLLIE QUINTANA, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

)

CASE NO: 19STCV07958

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DEEM ADMISSIONS ADMITTED

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

August 17, 2022

Defendant Mollie Quintana (“Defendant”) propounded requests for admissions (“RFAs”), set one, on Plaintiff Rodney Jordan (“Plaintiff”) on April 20, 2020. To date, despite extensions of time to respond, attempts to meet and confer, and Defendant re-serving the discovery multiples times, Plaintiff has not served responses. Defendant therefore seeks an order deeming the RFAs admitted and imposing sanctions.

Defendant’s motion is unopposed and granted. (CCP §2033.280(b).) Defendant’s RFAs, set one, are deemed admitted against Plaintiff.

Sanctions are mandatory. (CCP § 2033.280(c).) The court awards Defendant one hour for preparing the form motion to compel and one hour to appear at the hearing all at the reasonable rate of $185 per hour, for a total of $370 in attorney fees. Further, the court awards Defendant the motion filing fee of $61.65 as costs.

Sanctions are sought and imposed against Plaintiff, who is in pro per. Plaintiff is ordered to pay sanctions to Defendant, by and through counsel of record, in the total amount of $431.65, within twenty days.

Defendant is ordered to give notice.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement.
If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the court at sscdept31@lacourt.org with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number. The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.
Unless all parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument. You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.
If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave.

Dated this 17^th day of August 2022

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court