Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 20STCV13110, Date: 2022-10-25 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV13110    Hearing Date: October 25, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

LIANG XI MA, ET AL.,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

TA FONG RESTAURANT SUPPLY, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 20STCV13110

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

October 25, 2022

 

Plaintiffs Liang Xi Ma (“Ma”) and Pei Rong Wu (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action against defendants Ta Fong Restaurant Supply and Ta Fong Co. Inc. for injuries Ma sustained when she tripped and fell while entering defendants’ premises.  Trial is currently set for November 1, 2022. 

 

Defendant Ta Fong Co. Inc. (“Defendant”) now moves to continue the current trial date to January 10, 2023, or a date thereafter.  No opposition to the motion has been received. 

 

Although continuances of trials are disfavored, each request for a continuance must be considered on its own merits.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c).)  The Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing of good cause requiring the continuance.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c).) The Court may look to the following factors in determining whether a trial continuance is warranted:  (1) proximity of the trial date; (2) whether there was any previous continuance of trial due to any party; (3) the length of the continuance requested; (4) the availability of alternative means to address the problem that gave rise to the motion; (5) the prejudice that parties or witnesses will suffer as a result of the continuance; and (6) whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial.  (See generally, CRC Rule 3.1332(d)(1)-(11).)  Additional factors for the Court to consider include: a party’s excused inability to obtain essential testimony, documents, or other material evidence despite diligent efforts; whether all parties have stipulated to a continuance; and any other fact or circumstance relevant to the fair determination of the motion or application.  (CRC Rule 3.1332(c), (d).)

 

Here, Defendant asserts that it and Plaintiffs have reserved a mediation date of November 11, 2022, in an attempt to resolve this matter informally.  Defendant contends that the continuance will allow the parties to engage in meaningful settlement discussions at the mediation, which was the earliest available date.  Further, Defendant provides that Plaintiff has stipulated to the continuance.  (Mot. Exh. A.)  The motion is unopposed, and Defendant establishes good cause for the continuance. 

 

Defendant’s motion to continue trial is granted.  The November 1, 2022 trial date is continued to ______________ at 8:30 a.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse.  The October 25, 2022 Final Status Conference is continued to _______________ at 10:00 a.m. in Department 31.  All discovery and expert cutoff dates are to be based on the new trial date. 

 

Moving Defendant is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 25th day of October 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court