Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 20STCV14146, Date: 2022-08-04 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV14146    Hearing Date: August 4, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

JINKUN CHA, ET AL.,

                        PLAINTIFF(S),

            VS.

 

PACIFIC EXPRESSWAY, INC., ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 20STCV14146

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING KLF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

August 4, 2022

 

Plaintiffs Jinkun Cha and Cindy Tian (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and as successors in interest to Kangxi Tian (“Decedent”) filed this action against defendants Pacific Expressway, Inc. (“Pacific”) and Viewsonic Corporation (“Viewsonic”) for damages relating to the alleged wrongful death of Decedent.  Plaintiffs allege that Decedent was struck and killed by a truck while engaged in his occupation as a truck driver at a warehouse.  On June 3, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an Amendment to Complaint naming Marvin Contreras (“Contreras”) as Doe 1.  Thereafter, Viewsonic filed a cross-complaint against Pacific, Contreras, and Roes 1-50; on August 26, 2021, Viewsonic filed an Amendment to Cross-Complaint naming KLF Logistics, Inc. (“KLF”) as Roe 1. 

 

KLF provides that although it was not a named defendant in this action, it has agreed to pay Plaintiffs $50,000.00 for a full and final release of any claims arising out of the accident, and a full and final dismissal with prejudice of the cross-complaint by Viewsonic against it.  KLF now moves for an order finding the settlement is in good faith.  KLF has provided a declaration sufficiently addressing the factors in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward- Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488 to show that the settlement was made in good faith.  It discusses potential recovery, proportionate liability, the amount paid in settlement, and a lack of collusion or fraud.    

 

KLF filed the instant motion on June 14, 2022, asserting the settlement was made in good faith.  No party has filed an opposition to the motion.  The burden on a motion for determination of good faith settlement rests squarely on the party opposing the finding of good faith.  (CCP §877.6(d).)  In light of the lack of opposition, no party has met that burden. 

 

KLF’s motion for determination of good faith settlement is therefore granted.

 

Moving Cross-Defendant KLF is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 4th day of August 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court