Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 20STCV46147, Date: 2022-12-15 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV46147    Hearing Date: December 15, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

TIFFANY PERRY, ET AL.,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

GARFIELD GEORGE DUNCOMBE, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 20STCV46147

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

December 15, 2022

 

Plaintiffs Tiffany Perry (“Petitioner”), Hector Lozano (“Lozano”), Anthony Garcia Sotelo (“Sotelo”), and Nicholas Garcia Sotelo (“Claimant”), by and through his guardian ad litem, Petitioner, filed this action against defendants Garfield George Duncombe (“Duncombe”), et al. for damages arising from a motor vehicle vs. pedestrian accident.  Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Duncombe and Raul Slaza Secaida (“Secaida”), while in the course and scope of their employment with defendant Amazon Logistics, Inc. (“Amazon”) struck and killed Decedent Kelly Garcia (“Decedent”).  Decedent was Claimant’s, and the three other plaintiffs’, mother.  Claimant suffered emotional distress and general damages as a result of the incident. 

 

Plaintiffs have agreed to settle their claims with defendants Duncombe, Secaida, and Amazon for the total amount of $155,000.00, with $38,750 being apportioned to each of the four plaintiffs, including Claimant.  Pertaining to Claimant, if the settlement is approved, $9,687.50 will be used for attorney fees and $1,083.82 will be used for costs.  The net balance of $27,978.68 will be invested in a single-premium deferred annuity.   

 

The Court has reviewed the settlement and finds it fair and reasonable.  The Court also finds the attorney fees fair and reasonable, in that they amount to 25% of the minor’s settlement.  

 

Pursuant to CRC 7.952, Claimant and Petitioner must appear at the hearing on this matter unless the Court finds good cause to excuse their appearance.  Claimant herein is thirteen years old, and thus, the Court will require Claimant and Petitioner to appear at the hearing.  They are encouraged to appear remotely.  If the Court is satisfied with Claimant’s and Petitioner’s testimony, the Court will grant the petition.

 

Petitioner is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 15th day of December 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court