Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV01181, Date: 2023-01-11 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV01181    Hearing Date: January 11, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

Plaintiffs Mariano Pacleb (“Petitioner”), Byanka Delgadillo (“Delgadillo”), and Benicio Pacleb (“Claimant”), a minor, filed this action against Defendant Johana Marks (“Defendant”) for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.  Claimant suffered “acute pain” as a result of the accident.  (Petition ¶ 6.)  Claimant has now recovered completely the effects of the injuries. 

Plaintiffs have agreed to settle their claims with Defendant for the total amount of $30,000.00, with $9,000 being apportioned to Petitioner, $9,000 to Delgadillo, and $12,000 to Claimant.  Pertaining to Claimant, if the settlement is approved, $1,076.43 will be used for medical expenses.  The net balance of $10,923.57 will be invested in a single-premium deferred annuity.

The petition is denied for the following reasons: 

·       Petitioner has not been appointed as guardian ad litem for Claimant.  Appointment as a guardian ad litem is a prerequisite to petitioning the Court for the requested relief.  The Court cannot grant the petition until a guardian ad litem is appointed.

·       At ¶ 17, Petitioner indicates that Counsel has not and does not expect to receive attorney fees in connection with this action.  It is unclear whether Counsel is receiving any attorney fees from Petitioner’s or Delgadillo’s settlement amounts.  To the extent that Counsel is receiving attorney fees from the other settlement amounts, they must be disclosed at ¶ 17.  Alternatively, Counsel should clarify that Petitioner and Delgadillo are not paying any fees. 

Pursuant to CRC 7.952, Claimant and Petitioner must appear at the hearing on this matter unless the Court finds good cause to excuse their appearance.  Claimant herein is only four years old and was less than one year old when the accident occurred.  The Court finds Claimant’ age constitutes good cause to excuse Claimant’s appearance.  Only Petitioner will be required to appear in connection with a new petition after being appointed as guardian ad litem for Claimant and fixing the above defects. 

Petitioner is ordered to give notice. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

• Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement.
• If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the court at sscdept31@lacourt.org with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.  The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.  
• Unless all parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.  You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.  
• If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave. 

Dated this 11^th day of January 2023