Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV09694, Date: 2023-01-11 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV09694    Hearing Date: January 11, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

STANLEY W. HUMPHRIES, II,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

JOSE ALFREDO ESPARZA, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 21STCV09694

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

January 11, 2023

 

Plaintiff Stanley W. Humphries, II’s (“Plaintiff”) attorney of record, Daniel Geoulla Esq. (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel, contending there are irreconcilable differences and a complete breakdown in communication between the attorney and client.  Counsel declares it served the moving papers on Plaintiff via mail at Plaintiff’s last known address.  Counsel has filed proof of service on Plaintiff and on Defendants. 

However, Counsel’s proof of service indicates that the moving papers were served on Plaintiff electronically.  California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(d)(2) states: “If the notice is served on the client by electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 and rule 2.251, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client's current electronic service address.”  The Court cannot locate any such declaration with Counsel’s motion.

 

Absent a declaration from Counsel attesting that Plaintiff’s email address listed in the proof of service was confirmed as current, the motion cannot be granted.

 

Therefore, the motion is denied without prejudice.

 

 

Counsel is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 11th day of January 2023

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court