Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV13279, Date: 2022-12-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV13279 Hearing Date: December 9, 2022 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. TACOS EL FOGON GRILL, INC., ET AL., Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. December 9, 2022 |
Plaintiff Lourdes Silva (“Plaintiff”) propounded request for production of documents (“RPDs”), set two, on Defendant Tacos El Fogon Grill, Inc. (“Defendant”) on April 14, 2022. To date, attempts to meet and confer, Defendant has not served responses. Plaintiff therefore seeks an order compelling Defendant to respond, without objections, to the outstanding discovery and to pay sanctions.
Plaintiff motion is unopposed and granted. Defendant is ordered to serve verified responses to RPDs, set two, without objections, within ten days. (CCP § 2031.300(a), (b).)
Sanctions are mandatory unless the once subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or other circumstances make the imposition of sanctions unjust. (CCP § 2031.300(c).) Plaintiff is awarded one hour for preparing the form motion to compel and one hour to appear at the hearing all at the reasonable rate of $200 per hour, for a total of $400 in attorney fees. Further, Plaintiff is awarded the motion filing fee of $60 as costs.
Plaintiff seeks sanctions against Defendant and Defendant’s attorney of record. Plaintiff does not describe any conduct warranting sanctions against Defendant directly. The evidence shows that the discovery requests were served on, and the meet and confer efforts were made with, Defendant’s counsel, but Defendant’s counsel did not respond. Sanctions are imposed against Defendant’s attorney of record only. Defendant’s counsel is ordered to pay sanctions to Plaintiff, by and through counsel of record, in the total amount of $460.00, within twenty (20) days.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
· The Court is not available to hear oral argument on this date. If the parties do not submit on the tentative and want oral argument, the hearing will have to be continued, and the parties must work with the clerk to find an available date for the continuance.
Dated this 9th day of December 2022
| |
Hon. Audra Mori Judge of the Superior Court |