Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV18433, Date: 2022-10-25 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV18433    Hearing Date: October 25, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

ROCIO CAMPOS,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

JOSE F ESCOBAR MARTINEZ, ET AL.,

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 21STCV18433

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

October 25, 2022

 

Plaintiff Rocio Campos’s (“Plaintiff”) Motions to Compel Further Responses to Request for Admissions, set one, is premature and will be continued to a new date as set forth below.  The parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the Personal Injury section.

 

            Plaintiff has reserved an IDC for November 1, 2022, indicating that Plaintiff is aware of this requirement.  The parties are ordered to participate in the IDC as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures.  The hearing on the motion is continued to __________________ 1:30 p.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse.    

 

The Court is hopeful the hearing on the motion will not be necessary.  If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date.  The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue. 

 

The Court notes Plaintiff has numerous motions to compel further set to be heard between this date and November 2, 2022.  The Eighth Amended Standing Order provides, “PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery unless the parties have participated in an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a motion to compel further discovery responses.”  Plaintiff must reserve IDCs for each motion to compel further immediately and use the Court Reservation System to continue the Motions to Compel Further to occur after the IDCs.  Plaintiff is put on express notice that failure to do so may result in denial of all pending Motions to Compel Further.

 

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 25th day of October 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court