Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV28843, Date: 2023-01-12 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV28843    Hearing Date: January 12, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

ISABELLA BULTHUIS, ET AL.,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

JOSE LOZANO, JR., ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 21STCV28843

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

January 12, 2023

 

Plaintiff, Brian Bulthuis (“Petitioner”) and Isabella Bulthuis (“Claimant”), a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Petitioner, filed this action against Defendants Jose Lozano, Jr. and Christine Campos (collectively, “Defendants”) for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.  As a result of the accident, Claimant “complained of right shoulder pain, bilateral knee pain and chest pain… [and] was given a sling for her shoulder pain.”  (Petition ¶ 6.)  Claimant has now recovered completely from the effects of the injuries. 

 

Plaintiffs have agreed to settle all claims with Defendants for the total amount of $104,500.00, with $100,000 being apportioned to Petitioner and $4,500 to Claimant.  Pertaining to Claimant, if the settlement is approved, $780.26 will be used for medical expenses, $1,125.00 for attorney fees, and $30.00 will be used for costs.  Petitioner proposes to have the net balance of $2,564.74 be paid directly to him, without bond. 

 

The Court has reviewed the settlement and finds it fair and reasonable.  The Court also finds the attorney fees fair and reasonable, in that they amount to 25% of the minor’s settlement.

Pursuant to CRC 7.952, Claimant and Petitioner must appear at the hearing on this matter unless the Court finds good cause to excuse their appearance.  Claimant herein is seventeen years old, and thus, the Court will require Claimant and Petitioner to appear at the hearing.  They are encouraged to appear remotely.  The Court wishes to hear from Petitioner concerning the payment of the funds to Petitioner, without bond, and the Court wishes to know how Petitioner plans to use the funds in order to determine whether this is an appropriate arrangement.  If the Court is satisfied with Petitioner’s and Claimant’s testimony, the Court will grant the petition.

 

Petitioner is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 12th day of January 2023

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court