Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV29160, Date: 2023-02-28 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV29160    Hearing Date: February 28, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

EMERITA DAMARIS CENTENO DE LACAYO, ET AL.,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

ELINA BIANCA QASABIAN, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 21STCV29160

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

February 28, 2023

 

Plaintiffs Emerita Damaris Centeno De Lacayo (“Emerita”), Jose Gilbert Lacayo Ayala (“Ayala”), and Fernando Saul Lacayo (“Claimant”), a minor by and through his guardian ad litem, Saul Gilberto Lacayo Nolasco (“Petitioner”), filed this action against Defendant Elina Bianca Qasabian (“Defendant”) for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.  Claimant suffered aches and pain to neck, shoulder, arms, hands, and head.  Claimant has recovered completely from the effects of the injuries. 

 

Plaintiffs have agreed to settle their claims with Defendant for the total amount of $57,100.00, with $12,500 being apportioned to Claimant, $25,400 to Emerita, and $19,200 to Ayala.  Pertaining to Claimant, if the settlement is approved, $2,213.93 will be used for medical expenses, $4,125.00 for attorney fees, and $978.05 will be used for costs.  The net balance of $5,183.02 will be deposited into a blocked account.

 

The petition is denied without prejudice for the following reasons:

·       In Attachment 11b(6), Petitioner provides only that “[t]he reasons for the apportionment of the settlement payments between claimant and each other plaintiff is based on the damages amount of each plaintiff.”  However, Petitioner does not provide any information regarding each Plaintiffs’ damages.  Petitioner must submit this information, including information concerning each Plaintiffs’ special damages, to allow the Court to determine the reasons for the apportionment of the settlement proceeds. 

·       Petitioner requests approximately 33% of Claimant’s settlement be used for attorney fees.  The Court is not satisfied the efforts in this case, which basically involve settlement negotiations, justify such a high fee.  The Court asks counsel to reduce the fee in connection with an amended petition.  The Court does not typically award attorney fees in excess of 25% in cases involving minors absent extraordinary efforts, described with particularity, on the part of counsel.

 

Petitioner is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 28th day of February 2023

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court