Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 21STCV33448, Date: 2022-11-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV33448 Hearing Date: November 14, 2022 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. JACOB LEE EICHENBERGER, ET AL., Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. November 14, 2022 |
Plaintiff Brittney Monique Washington (“Plaintiff”) attorney of record, Bob B. Khakshooy of the Law Offices of Bob B. Khakshooy, (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel. Counsel declares that Counsel is unable to locate or communicate with Plaintiff, as Plaintiff has been unresponsive to Counsel’s attempts to discuss the case with her. Counsel declares the moving papers were served on Plaintiff at a confirmed address.
In the Proof of Service, counsel indicates the motion was served on Plaintiff by electronic mail. California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d)(2) states: “If the notice is served on the client by electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 and rule 2.251, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client's current electronic service address.” The Court cannot locate any such declaration with Counsel’s notice of motion, which must be filed before the motion can be granted.
Counsel also states in his declaration that he confirmed the address through certified mail, return receipt. Certified mail does not establish proof the address is confirmed unless there is a signed return receipt. (See Cal. Rules of court, rule 3.1362(d)(2).) Thus, if Counsel re-files the motion and confirms Plaintiff’s address as current through this method, Counsel must provide a copy of the signed return receipt.
Therefore, the motion is denied without prejudice. Moving Counsel is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Dated this 14th day of November 2022
| |
Hon. Audra Mori Judge of the Superior Court |