Judge: Audra Mori, Case: 22STCV12815, Date: 2022-09-08 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV12815    Hearing Date: September 8, 2022    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

BARRY UCHE NNANNA,

                        Plaintiff(s),

            vs.

 

RICKY ATKINSON, ET AL.,

                        Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 22STCV12815

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SCHEDULE IDCs AND CONTINUE FUTURE MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

September 8, 2022

 

Plaintiff Barry Uche Nnanna’s (“Plaintiff”) Motions to Compel Further Responses to Form and Special Interrogatories, set one, are premature and will be continued to a new date as set forth below.  The parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the Personal Injury section.

 

            Plaintiff has reserved an IDC for October 20, 2022, indicating that Plaintiff is aware of this requirement.  The hearing on the motion is continued to __________________ at 1:30 p.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse.    

 

The Court is hopeful the hearing on the motion will not be necessary.  If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date.  The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue. 

 

The Court notes Plaintiff has numerous motions to compel further set to be heard between September 22 and October 4, 2022, and there are no IDCs predating these motions.  The Seventh Amended Standing Order provides, “PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery unless the parties have participated in an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a motion to compel further discovery responses.”  Plaintiff must reserve IDCs for each motion to compel further immediately and use the Court Reservation System to continue the Motions to Compel Further to occur after the IDCs.  Plaintiff is put on express notice that failure to do so may result in denial of all pending Motions to Compel Further.

 

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

 

Dated this 8th day of September 2022

 

 

 

 

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court