Judge: Bradley S. Phillips, Case: 24STCV04948, Date: 2024-10-07 Tentative Ruling

1. If you wish to submit on the tentative ruling, please email the clerk at SMCdept26@lacourt.org (and "cc" all other parties in the same email) no later than 7:30 am on the day of the hearing, and please notify all other parties in advance that you will not be appearing at the hearing. Include the word "SUBMISSION" in all caps in the subject line and include your name, contact information, the case number, and the party you represent in the body of the email. If you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the motion, and the Court may decide not to adopt the tentative ruling.

2. For any motion where no parties submit on the tentative ruling in advance, and no parties appear at the motion hearing, the Court may elect to either adopt the tentative ruling or take the motion off calendar, in its discretion.


3. PLEASE DO NOT USE THIS EMAIL (SMCdept26@lacourt.org) FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO SUBMIT ON A TENTATIVE RULING. The Court will not read or respond to emails sent to this address for any other purpose.




Case Number: 24STCV04948    Hearing Date: October 7, 2024    Dept: 26

TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to her Form Interrogatories and for monetary sanctions is granted.  Defendant failed to provide any timely response to the Interrogatories and did not serve a response until more than two months after the filing of this motion.  The Court finds that Defendant waived any objections to the Interrogatories, except those, if any, based upon the constitutional or privacy rights of third parties.  Defendant has not established on the current record that its failure to serve responses was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.  That finding is without prejudice to Defendant’s right to file a motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 2030.290(a).  Absent the filing of such a motion within 10 days, Defendant shall serve answers to the Form Interrogatories, without objections (except as stated above), within 20 days.  The filing of such a motion shall stay Defendant's obligation to serve further answers.

Defendant and its counsel are ordered to pay to Plaintiff sanctions in the amount of $1,993.91.  The Court finds that such sanctions would be warranted even if Defendant showed, on further motion, that its failure to serve responses was due to excusable neglect, based on one lawyer’s failures in multiple cases, because Defendant and its counsel, not Plaintiff, should in any event bear the cost of such neglect.