Judge: Bruce G. Iwasaki, Case: 18STCV03704, Date: 2022-10-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 18STCV03704 Hearing Date: October 3, 2022 Dept: 58
Judge Bruce G. Iwasaki
Hearing
Date: October 3, 2022
Case
Name: Joan Cheroti v.
Trina Patterson et al.
Case
No.: 18STCV03704
Matter: Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel
Moving
Party: Counsel for Plaintiff,
Joan Cheroti
Responding
Party: Unopposed
Tentative Ruling: The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is continued
unless Counsel files
a supplemental declaration detailing that he served the client’s
most current e-mail address.
This is a request by Plaintiff’s
counsel to be relieved as counsel due to a breakdown of client communication. The Court previously continued the hearing
because counsel did not provide a declaration attesting that his client’s
electronic service address is current under California Rules of Court, rule
3.1362(d)(2).
Counsel has filed a supplemental
declaration, which now indicates he “personally served the client with copies
of the motion papers filed with this declaration.” However, no proof of service has been filed
with this Court, and the proof of service for the supplemental declaration
still indicates electronic service.
If, before the hearing, counsel
Weissman submits a second supplemental declaration in support of his motion to
be relieved as counsel that includes proof of timely service upon plaintiff
Cheroti and the method of service, the Court will consider it. Otherwise, the motion will be continued to a
later date to be decided at the hearing.