Judge: Bruce G. Iwasaki, Case: 22STCV09064, Date: 2023-04-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV09064 Hearing Date: April 25, 2023 Dept: 58
Judge Bruce G. Iwasaki
Department 58
Hearing Date:             April 25,
2023
Case Name:                Reyna
Yanez Mendez, et al. v. Paul Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust, et al.
Case No.:                    22STCV09064
Motion:                       Petition
to Approve Compromise of Claim for Minor 
Moving Party:             Petitioner
Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez
Opposing Party:          None
Tentative Ruling:      The
petition to approve compromise of claim on behalf of minor is granted.  
Background
            This is a habitability case. 
Plaintiffs Reyna Yanez Mendez, Gernaro Vasquez Antonio, Lizbeth Vasquez
Yanez, Omar Vasquez Yanez, Mireya Reyes Vasquez (through her guardian ad litem Lizbeth
Vasquez Yanez) and Rudy Reyes Vasquez (through his guardian ad litem Lizbeth
Vasquez Yanez) sued Defendants Paul Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust and
Sun Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust for breach of warranty of
habitability, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, negligence, and breach of
contract.  Plaintiffs allege that they
experienced insect, vermin, and rodent infestation; defective and deteriorated
flooring; general dilapidation and improper maintenance; inoperable, dirty, and
in bad repair doors and windows; and loose plumbing fixtures at 1307 S. Harvard
Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90066. 
            
            Plaintiffs have settled the case
with the Defendants for $60,000.00.  Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez (“Petitioner”) now
seeks approval of a compromise of a claim on behalf of minor Rudy Reyes Vasquez
(“claimant” or “minor”), age 7. 
Legal Standard
            An
enforceable settlement of a minor’s claim or that of a person lacking the
capacity to make decisions can only be consummated with court approval. (Prob.
Code., §§ 2504, 3500, 3600¿et seq.; Code Civ. Proc., § 372; see¿Pearson
v. Super. Ct. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337.)¿ 
¿ 
“[T]he
protective role the court generally assumes in cases involving minors, [is] a
role to assure that whatever is done is in the minor’s best interests…[I]ts¿primary concern is
whether the compromise is sufficient to provide for the minor’s injuries, care
and treatment.” (Goldberg v. Super. Ct.¿(1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1378,
1382.)¿ 
 
A petition for
court approval of a compromise or covenant not to sue under¿Code of Civil
Procedure¿section¿372 must comply with California Rules of Court, rules¿7.950,
7.951 and 7.952. The petition must be verified by the petitioner and contain a
full disclosure of all information that has “any bearing upon the
reasonableness” of the compromise or the covenant.¿(Cal. Rules of Court,
rule¿7.950.)¿
In addition, the
court must approve reasonable expenses and court costs to be paid out of the
settlement proceeds. (Prob. Code, § 3601(a).) 
Discussion
Petitioner properly filed the petition on the judicial
council form and verified it. Petitioner also submitted the requisite
attachments with the petition.  
            Of the
$60,000.00 settlement sum, Plaintiffs
Reyna Yanez Mendez, Gernaro Vasquez Antonio, Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez, and Omar
Vasquez Yanez each receive $12,500.00. Mireya Reyes Vasquez, another minor,
receives $5,000.00. Claimant also receives $5,000.00. Plaintiffs are one
family. The court finds this apportionment reasonable. 
The Petition includes a declaration of Plaintiff’s attorney
Rachel Fishenfeld. She seeks 25 percent of the claimant’s settlement total, or
$1,250.00 in fees. (Decl. Fishenfeld, ¶ 4.) This also is reasonable.
            Thus, the
court grants the petition.  
Judge Bruce G. Iwasaki
Department 58
Hearing Date:             April 25,
2023
Case Name:                Reyna
Yanez Mendez, et al. v. Paul Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust, et al.
Case No.:                    22STCV09064
Motion:                       Petition
to Approve Compromise of Claim for Minor 
Moving Party:             Petitioner
Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez
Opposing Party:          None
Tentative Ruling:      The
petition to approve compromise of claim on behalf of minor is granted.  
Background
            This is a habitability case. 
Plaintiffs Reyna Yanez Mendez, Gernaro Vasquez Antonio, Lizbeth Vasquez
Yanez, Omar Vasquez Yanez, Mireya Reyes Vasquez (through her guardian ad litem Lizbeth
Vasquez Yanez) and Rudy Reyes Vasquez (through his guardian ad litem Lizbeth
Vasquez Yanez) sued Defendants Paul Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust and
Sun Kim, trustee of the Kim Family Trust for breach of warranty of
habitability, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, negligence, and breach of
contract.  Plaintiffs allege that they
experienced insect, vermin, and rodent infestation; defective and deteriorated
flooring; general dilapidation and improper maintenance; inoperable, dirty, and
in bad repair doors and windows; and loose plumbing fixtures at 1307 S. Harvard
Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90066. 
            
            Plaintiffs have settled the case
with all Defendants for $60,000.  Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez (“Petitioner”) now
seeks approval of a compromise of a claim on behalf of minor Mireya Reyes
Vasquez (“claimant” or “minor), age 15. 
Legal Standard
            An
enforceable settlement of a minor’s claim or that of a person lacking the
capacity to make decisions can only be consummated with court approval. (Prob.
Code., §§ 2504, 3500, 3600¿et seq.; Code Civ. Proc., § 372; see¿Pearson
v. Super. Ct. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337.)¿ 
¿ 
“[T]he
protective role the court generally assumes in cases involving minors, [is] a
role to assure that whatever is done is in the minor’s best interests…[I]ts¿primary concern is
whether the compromise is sufficient to provide for the minor’s injuries, care
and treatment.” (Goldberg v. Super. Ct.¿(1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1378,
1382.)¿ 
 
A petition for
court approval of a compromise or covenant not to sue under¿Code of Civil
Procedure¿section¿372 must comply with California Rules of Court, rules¿7.950,
7.951 and 7.952. The petition must be verified by the petitioner and contain a
full disclosure of all information that has “any bearing upon the
reasonableness” of the compromise or the covenant.¿(Cal. Rules of Court,
rule¿7.950.)¿
In addition, the
court must approve reasonable expenses and court costs to be paid out of the
settlement proceeds. (Prob. Code, § 3601(a).) 
Discussion
Petitioner properly filed the petition on the judicial council
form and verified it. Petitioner also submitted the requisite attachments with
the petition.  
            Of the
$60,000.00 settlement sum, Plaintiffs
Reyna Yanez Mendez, Gernaro Vasquez Antonio, Lizbeth Vasquez Yanez, and Omar
Vasquez Yanez each receive $12,500.00. Rudy Reyes Vasquez, another minor,
receives $5,000.00. Claimant also receives $5,000.00. Plaintiffs are one
family. The court finds this apportionment reasonable. 
The Petition includes a declaration of Plaintiff’s attorney
Rachel Fishenfeld. She seeks 25 percent of the claimant’s settlement total, or
$1,250.00 in fees. (Decl. Fishenfeld, ¶ 4.) This also is reasonable.
            Thus, the court
grants the petition.