Judge: Bruce G. Iwasaki, Case: 22STCV10299, Date: 2023-02-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV10299 Hearing Date: February 9, 2023 Dept: 58
Judge Bruce G. Iwasaki
Hearing
Date: February 9, 2023
Case
Name: Jeff Dargah v.
Robert Williams et al.
Case
No.: 22STCV10299
Matter: Default Judgment
Application
Moving
Party: Plaintiff Jeff Dargah
Responding Party: Unopposed
Tentative Ruling: The
Court denies the request for default judgment.
Background
This is a wrongful
eviction action. Plaintiff Jeff Dargah
sues Defendants Robert Williams and Jubilio Escalara for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of quiet
enjoyment, trespass, nuisance, negligent and intentional infliction of
emotional distress, negligence, wrongful eviction, and conversion.
Plaintiff alleged
that his rented bedroom was uninhabitable with mold, defective plumbing, and
unsafe security. In June 2021, Plaintiff
allegedly injured himself at work and was unable to pay rent. The property manager, Escalara, reportedly
harassed Plaintiff by filing a restraining order and multiple unlawful detainer
actions against him.
Default was
entered against both individual Defendants on December 20, 2022. The Doe defendants were dismissed on January
24, 2023.
Discussion
Plaintiff requests
damages in the total amount of $813,500.
This represents $250,000 for emotional distress damages, $58,500 for
special damages, $500,000 in punitive damages, and $5,000 in attorney fees.
“Plaintiffs
in a default judgment proceeding must prove they are entitled to the damages
claimed.” (Barragan v. Banco BCH (1986) 188 Cal.App.3d 283, 302, citing
Code Civ. Proc., § 585 & Taliaferro v. Hoogs (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d
559, 560.) If evidence is presented by
declaration, the facts must be shown to be “within the personal knowledge of
the affiant and shall be set forth with particularity, and each affidavit shall
show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify
competently thereto.” (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 585, subd. (d).)
As
to the $50,000 for personal property, Plaintiff avers that numerous items were
not returned to him, including several credit cards, passport, driver’s
license, medications, clothing, personal furniture, and $8,500 in cash. (Dargah Decl., ¶ 53.) Plaintiff also provides a letter from Tarzana
Medical Urgent Care and a medical bill from his psychotherapist indicating
$2,000 in costs incurred. (Dargah Decl.,
Ex. 10.)
However,
Plaintiff does not provide any support for his request of $250,000 in emotional
distress damages and the $50,000 request for personal property is
insufficiently supported. While he avers
that he was “stranded, homeless, and slept the night in [his car]” and suffered
emotional distress, he does not provide any medical reports documenting that
stress. (Dargah Decl., ¶ 46.) Similarly, he does not document or itemize
the personal items that were purportedly lost when Defendants locked him out of
the bedroom.
Accordingly,
the Court denies the request for default judgment to a later date for Plaintiff
to produce declarations with the corresponding calculations and evidence.