Judge: Bruce G. Iwasaki, Case: 22STCV27572, Date: 2023-02-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV27572 Hearing Date: February 24, 2023 Dept: 58
Judge Bruce G. Iwasaki
Department 58
Hearing Date: February
24, 2023
Case Name: Control Air Enterprises, LLC v. Webcor Construction, L.P. et
al.
Case No.: 22STCV27572
Motion: Demurrers
x2
Motion
for stay and for an order compelling Plaintiff to comply with the parties’
contractual dispute resolution procedures
Moving Party: Defendants
Next Century Partners, LLC and Next Century Partners Mezzanine Borrower, LLC
Opposing Party: Plaintiff
Control Air Enterprises LLC
Tentative Ruling: The
demurrers and motion to stay and for an order compelling Plaintiff to comply
with the parties’ contractual dispute resolution procedures are taken off
calendar.
This is a construction dispute between a subcontractor,
general contractor, and the developer of the Hyatt Regency Century Plaza Hotel.
Next Century Partners, LLC and Next
Century Partners Mezzanine Borrower, LLC (Defendants) filed demurrers and a
motion for stay. The motion to stay
sought an order compelling Plaintiff to comply with certain dispute resolution
procedures in the parties’ contract, which included sending this matter to a
judicial referee.
Defendants’ counsel withdrew from
this case on January 23, 2023.
Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Intent
to File Amended Pleading” on February 9, 2023.
While Code of Civil Procedure section 472 states that the amended
pleading should be filed and served “no later than the date for filing an
opposition to the demurrer,” the statute also allows for the filing “after the
date for filing an opposition to the demurrer . . . upon stipulation by the
parties.” Defendants are no longer
represented and so the Court accepts Plaintiff’s representation that it will file
the amended pleading on or before February 24, 2023. Accordingly, the demurrers are taken off
calendar.
In addition, Defendants are LLCs,
and so, must be represented by counsel to appear in litigation. (Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v.
Municipal Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 724, 731.)
Therefore, the Court also takes the motion to stay and for an order
compelling Plaintiff to comply with the parties’ contractual dispute resolution
procedures off calendar.