Judge: Cherol J. Nellon, Case: 20STCV01265, Date: 2023-10-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV01265 Hearing Date: January 16, 2024 Dept: 14
Ivry v. Villa Marina East V Condominium Association
Case Background
Case No. 20 STCV 01265
Plaintiff
Simona Ivry (“Ivry”) lives in a 3rd-floor condominium. She alleges
that Defendants removed, or allowed the removal of, load-bearing walls in the 1st-floor
condominium below hers, resulting in damage to her unit.
Complaint
On January
10, 2020, Plaintiff Ivry filed her Complaint for (1) Breach of CC&Rs, (2)
Negligence, and (3) Nuisance against Defendants Villa Marina East V Condominium
Association (“HOA”), Donald Alan Zambos (“Zambos”), and DOES 1-10.
On February 19, 2020, Defendant HOA
filed its Answer.
On August 6, 2020, Defendant Zambos
filed his Answer.
On February
5, 2021, Plaintiff Ivry filed an “Amendment to Complaint” substituting Defendant
Metal Supply, LLC (“Metal Supply”) in lieu of DOE 1.
On September 1, 2022, Plaintiff Ivry
filed two “Amendments to Complaint” substituting Defendants Cardoso &
Associates, Inc. (“Cardoso”) and RJ Covington General Contractor, Inc. (“Covington
Business”) in lieu of DOES 2-3, respectively.
On October 7, 2022, Defendant
Cardoso filed its Answer.
On October 21,
2022, Plaintiff Ivry filed an “Amendment to Complaint” substituting Defendant RJ
Covington (“Covington”) in lieu of DOE 4.
On November 4, 2022, Defendant Covington
filed his Answer.
On June 20,
2023, Plaintiff Ivry filed an “Amendment to Complaint” substituting Defendant City
of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (“LA DBS”) in lieu of DOE 5.
On December
29, 2023, Plaintiff Ivry voluntarily dismissed Defendant LA DBS, without
prejudice.
HOA Cross-Complaint
On February
19, 2020, Defendant HOA filed its Cross-Complaint for (1) Indemnity and (2)
Contribution against Cross-Defendants Zambos, MBN Enterprise, Inc. dba Decker
Construction and Development (“MBN”), and ROES 1-20.
On September 9, 2020, the default
of Defendant MBN was entered.
On September 10, 2020, Cross-Defendant
Zambos filed his Answer.
On
September 9, 2020, Cross-Complainant HOA filed two “Amendments to
Cross-Complaint” substituting Defendants Decker Swanson Enterprises, Inc. (“Decker
Swanson”) and Design Tech Home Inc. dba Design Tech Construction Services (“Design
Tech”) in lieu of ROES 1-2, respectively.
On May 18, 2021, Intervenor Atain
Specialty Insurance Company (“Atain”) intervened to file an answer[1] on
behalf of its insured, Decker Swanson Enterprises, Inc.
On July 6,
2021, Cross-Complainant HOA filed an “Amendment to Cross-Complaint”
substituting Defendant Metal Supply in lieu of ROE 1.
On September
16, 2022, Cross-Complainant HOA filed an “Amendment to Cross-Complaint”
substituting Cross-Defendant Covington Business in lieu of ROE 4.
On February
14, 2023, Cross-Defendant HOA filed an “Amendment to Complaint” substituting Cross-Defendant
Covington in lieu of DOE 5.
On April 10, 2023, Cross-Defendant
Covington filed his Answer.
On October 30, 2023, Cross-Complainant
HOA voluntarily dismissed Cross-Defendant Covington Business, without
prejudice.
Cardoso Cross-Complaint
On October
7, 2022, Defendant Cardoso filed its Cross-Complaint for (1)-(2) Indemnity and
(3) Declaratory Relief against Cross-Defendant MOES 1-100.
Case No. 22 STCV 37760
Plaintiffs
Morton Algaze and Sandra Lee Algaze (“Plaintiff Algazes”) in this case are the
occupants of the second-floor unit, between Plaintiff Ivry and Defendant
Zambos in the above case. They also allege structural problems with their unit.
On February
17, 2023, Plaintiff Algazes filed their First Amended Complaint for Breach of
CC&Rs against Defendants HOA, Zambos, and DOES 1-50.
On April 5,
2023, Defendant HOA filed its Answer.
On May 30,
2023, Defendant Zambos filed his Answer.
HOA Cross-Complaint
On April 5,
2023, Defendant HOA filed its Cross-Complaint for (1) Indemnity and (2)
Contribution against Cross-Defendants Covington Business, Covington, Decker
Swanson, Metal Supply, and MOES 1-50.
On July 13,
2023, Cross-Defendant Covington filed their Answer.
On October
19, 2023, Cross-Complainant HOA voluntarily dismissed Cross-Defendant Covington
Business, without prejudice.
As Consolidated
On July 11,
2023, this court ordered the two cases consolidated for all purposes. Five
pleadings remain pending: (1) Plaintiff Ivry’s Complaint against Defendants
HOA, Zambos, Metal Supply, Cardoso, and Covington, (2) Plaintiff Algazes’ Complaint
against Defendants HOA and Zambos, (3) Defendant HOA’s first cross-complaint
against Cross-Defendants Zambos, MBN, Decker Swanson, Design Tech, Atain, Metal
Supply, and Covington, (4) Defendant Cardoso’s complaint against the MOES, and
(5) Defendant HOA’s second cross-complaint against Cross-Defendants Covington,
Decker Swanson and Metal Supply.
Jury Trial
is currently set for February 20, 2024.
(1) OSC re: Entry
of Default
On October
3, 2023, this court issued an OSC re: Entry of Default of (a) Defendant Metal
Supply for failure to answer the Ivry Complaint, (b) Defendant Covington
Business for failure to answer the Ivry Complaint, and (c) Cross-Defendant
Design Tech for failure to answer the HOA’s first Cross-Complaint. The OSC was
set for October 20, 2023.
The OSC was
held on October 20, 2023, as scheduled. Plaintiff Ivry had filed a request for
entry of Metal Supply’s default the morning of the hearing, but it had not been
processed. Plaintiff Ivry had not filed a request for entry of Covington
Business’s default, however, and Cross-Complainant HOA had not filed a request
for entry of Cross-Defendant Design Tech’s default. The OSC was continued to
December 28, 2023.
The clerk’s
office rejected the request for entry of Metal Supply’s default. (Notice of
Rejection filed October 20, 2023). No other requests were filed by any counsel.
The OSC was
held again on December 28, 2023. Counsel for Plaintiff Ivry and
Cross-Complainant HOA assured the court that action would be taken. (Minute Order
of December 28, 2023). The OSC was continued to the instant date.
On January
5, 2024, Plaintiff Ivry again filed a request for entry of Metal Supply’s
default. On January 9, 2024, the clerk’s office rejected the request. No
similar attempt has been made to enter the default of Defendant Covington
Business. And Cross-Complainant HOA has made no similar attempt to enter the
default of Cross-Defendant Design Tech.
Code of
Civil Procedure §§ 583.410(a) and 583.420(a)(2) and California Rules of
Court Rule 3.1340 vest this court with discretion to dismiss a case for lack of
prosecution if it has not been brought to trial within either two (Section 583.420(a)(2)(B)
and Rule 3.1340) or three (Section 583.420(a)(2)(A)) years.
Defendant
Metal Supply will have been a named defendant in the Ivry Complaint for three
years on February 5, 2024. Defendant Covington Business has been a named
defendant in the Ivry Complaint for well over two years. Cross-Defendant Design
Tech has been a named cross-defendant in the HOA’s first cross-complaint for
over three years. It is time they were either defaulted or dismissed.
The OSC re:
default is CONTINUED to February 8, 2024, at 8:30 am.
The court
also sets an OSC re: dismissal of the Complaint filed on January 10, 2020, against
Defendants Metal Supply, LLC and RJ Covington General Contractor, Inc., as well
as of the Cross-Complaint filed by Defendant HOA on February 19, 2020, as against
Cross-Defendant Design Tech Home Inc. dba Design Tech Construction Services. That
OSC will also be held on February 8, 2024, at 8:30 am.
There will
be no further continuances of either OSC.
(2) OSC re:
Dismissal
On October
3, 2023, this court issued an OSC re: Dismissal of the Ivry Complaint against Defendant
LA DBS, and the HOA’s first Cross-Complaint against Metal Supply and Covington
Business, for failure to timely serve those parties with the relevant pleadings.
The OSC was set for October 20, 2023.
The OSC was
held on October 20, 2023, as scheduled. The HOA had filed a request for
dismissal of Cross-Defendant Covington Business. No other dismissals had been
filed. The OSC was continued to December 28, 2023.
The OSC was
held again on December 28, 2023. Counsel for Plaintiff Ivry had filed a request
for dismissal of Defendant LA DBS. The OSC was continued to the instant date.
As of the
present date, no further requests for dismissal have been filed.
The OSC re:
Dismissal of the Ivry Complaint against Defendant La DBS is now DISCHARGED. The
OSC re: Dismissal of the HOA’s first Cross-Complaint against Cross-Defendant
Covington Business is now DISCHARGED. Both of those parties have been dismissed
from the relevant pleadings.
The
Cross-Complaint filed by Defendant HOA on February 19, 2020, as against Cross-Defendant
Metal Supply, is DISMISSED pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
§ 583.210(a) for failure to timely serve. See Inversiones Papaluchi
S.A.S. v. Superior Court (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1055, 1061 (“[i]n
short, a plaintiff has three years from the date of filing the complaint to identify
and serve a Doe defendant”). Cross-Complainant HOA filed its cross-complaint in
the Ivry Case on February 19, 2020. All Cross-Defendants should have been
served by February 19, 2023. But Cross-Complainant HOA has neither served nor
dismissed Cross-Defendant Metal Supply. There is no reason to continue this OSC
any further.
[1] The
document is captioned “Complaint-in-Intervention” but it states no causes of
action, seeks no affirmative relief, and is clearly in substance an answer. On
June 21, 2021, Cross-Complainant HOA filed an “answer” to this document. Since
there is no such thing as an answer to an answer, that June filing is a
nullity.