Judge: Cherol J. Nellon, Case: 21STCV38247, Date: 2025-02-19 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 21STCV38247    Hearing Date: February 19, 2025    Dept: 14

#3

Case Background

Plaintiff Santiago Alvarez (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint against Defendant Biagi Bros, Inc (“Defendant”) and Does 1-100. The Complaint asserts a cause of action for PAGA violations.

Instant Pleading

Plaintiff moves for approval of PAGA settlement.

Decision

Plaintiff’s motion for approval of the PAGA settlement agreement is GRANTED.

Legal Standard

Labor Code, section 2699 states, in pertinent part, as follows:

 

“(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any provision of this code that provides for a civil penalty to be assessed and collected by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or any of its departments, divisions, commissions, boards, agencies, or employees, for a violation of this code, may, as an alternative, be recovered through a civil action brought by an aggrieved employee on behalf of himself or herself and other current or former employees pursuant to the procedures specified in

Section 2699.3

(i) Except as provided in subdivision (j), civil penalties recovered by aggrieved employees shall be distributed as follows: 75 percent to the Labor and Workforce Development Agency for enforcement of labor laws, including the administration of this part, and for education of employers and employees about their rights and responsibilities under this code, to be continuously appropriated to supplement and not supplant the funding to the agency for those purposes; and 25 percent to the aggrieved employees.

(l)(1) For cases filed on or after July 1, 2016, the aggrieved employee or representative shall, within 10 days following commencement of a civil action pursuant to this part, provide the Labor and Workforce Development Agency with a file-stamped copy of the complaint that includes the case number assigned by the court.

(2) The superior court shall review and approve any settlement of any civil action filed pursuant to this part. The proposed settlement shall be submitted to the agency at the same time that it is submitted to the court…”

 

Discussion

The terms of the proposed settlement are as follows. Defendant will pay a total $195,000. (Mot. for Approval at p.3.) Defendant will pay $68,250 in attorney’s fees and $70,528.53 in costs to Plaintiff’s counsel, $10,000 to Plaintiff for the resolution of Plaintiff’s individual claims, in exchange for his Civil Code section 1542 waiver and as an incentive payment for bringing this action on behalf of the State of California and his coworkers; and $3,850 to the settlement administrator. (Id.) The net settlement is $42,371.47. The LWDA will receive $31,778.60 of the net settlement, which represents 75% of the net settlement. The aggrieved employees will receive $10,892.87 of the net settlement, representing 25% of the net settlement.

The proposed settlement satisfies the requirements of Labor Code, section 2699. The LWDA has been notified of the settlement as required by the statute, and they have chosen not to object. In the absence of any objection from the LWDA, the motion is GRANTED.

Conclusion

Plaintiff’s motion for approval of the PAGA settlement agreement is GRANTED.