Judge: Cherol J. Nellon, Case: 22STCV01730, Date: 2025-04-02 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV01730 Hearing Date: April 2, 2025 Dept: 14
#9
Case Background
This is an action for violations of the FEHA, wrongful
termination, and violation of public policy. Plaintiff alleges she suffered
discrimination after she requested accommodations for her disability.
On January 14, 2022, Plaintiff Essie Phillips filed her
Complaint against Defendant Platinum Security, Inc.
On June 30, 2022, the parties stipulated to arbitration
and the matter was stayed.
On February 5, 2025, Defendant filed a petition to
confirm arbitration award.
Instant Pleading
Defendant moves to confirm arbitration award.
Decision
Defendant’s motion to confirm arbitration award is
GRANTED.
Discussion
Code of Civil Procedure, section
1285 states that “[a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made
may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition
shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as
respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” Upon service and
filing of a petition to confirm arbitration award, the court shall confirm the
award as made, unless it corrects or vacates the award, or dismisses the
proceeding. (Id., section 1286.) Where the petition is served but no
response is served and filed, the allegations in the petition are deemed
admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., section 1290; Taheri Law Group, A.P.C. v.
Sorokurs (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 956, 962.)
Code Civ. Proc., section 1285.4
adds that:
A petition under this chapter shall:
(a) Set forth the substance of or
have attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies
the existence of such an agreement.
(b) Set forth the names of the
arbitrators.
(c) Set forth or have attached a
copy of the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.
Here, the petition includes a copy of the parties’
dispute resolution agreement. (Petition, Exhs. A, B.) The petition includes a
copy of the arbitration award and the arbitrator’s written opinion. (Petition, Exh.
C.) The award states the arbitrator’s name is Hon. Rita J. Miller, Ret. (Id.)
The petition was served on Plaintiff via mail and email. Because Plaintiff does
not oppose the petition, the allegations in the petition are deemed admitted.
Having met the requirements of Code Civ. Proc., sections 1285 and 1285.4, the
petition is granted.
Conclusion
Defendant’s motion to confirm arbitration award is
GRANTED.