Judge: Cherol J. Nellon, Case: 23STCV08275, Date: 2023-10-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV08275 Hearing Date: October 18, 2023 Dept: 14
Instant Request
Defendant Cohen now demurs to the FAC on the ground that
it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Decision
The
demurrer is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR. Defendant Cohen to Answer within 10 days.
Governing Statute
Code of Civil Procedure § 1541 provides:
“Any
person aggrieved by a decision of the Controller or as to whose claim the
Controller has failed to make a decision within 180 days after the filing of
the claim, may commence an action, naming the Controller as a defendant, to
establish his or her claim in the superior court in any county or city and
county in which the Attorney General has an office. The action shall be brought
within 90 days after the decision of the Controller or within 270 days from the
filing of the claim if the Controller fails to make a decision. The summons and
a copy of the complaint shall be served upon the Controller and the Attorney
General and the Controller shall have 60 days within which to respond by
answer. The action shall be tried without a jury.”
Discussion
A demurrer is not an available responsive pleading in
this type of case. The statute which authorizes this action provides that the Defense
should “respond by answer.”
The demurrer here illustrates the reason for the rule.
Defense argues that Plaintiff hasn’t pled facts which would prove his claim.
But a complaint is not required to plead evidentiary facts. C.W. Johnson
& Sons, Inc. v. Carpenter (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 165, 169. All
that Plaintiff needs to plead to meet the statutory authorization is that he
made a claim which the Controller either denied or ignored. The validity of
that claim is a matter to be decided on the presentation of evidence, not the
pleadings.
Conclusion
Because the only authorized response under the statute is
an Answer, the demurrer is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR. Defendant Cohen is to file an
Answer within 10 days.