Judge: Christian R. Gullon, Case: 23PSCV03601, Date: 2024-10-15 Tentative Ruling
The Court may change tentative rulings at any time. Therefore, attorneys are advised to check this website to determine if any changes or updates have been made to the tentative ruling.
Counsel may submit on the tentative rulings by calling the clerk in Dept. O at 909-802-1126 before 8:30 the morning of the hearing. Submission on the tentative does not bind the court to adopt the tentative ruling at the hearing should the opposing party appear and convince the court of further modification during oral argument.
The Tentative Ruling is not an invitation, nor an opportunity, to file any further documents relative to the hearing in question. No such filing will be considered by the Court in the absence of permission first obtained following ex-parte application therefore.
Case Number: 23PSCV03601 Hearing Date: October 15, 2024 Dept: O
Tentative Ruling
MOTION AND
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT is TBD; Plaintiff
is to file a notice of related case.
Background
This case
arises from an unlawful detainer (UD).
On November
17, 2023, Plaintiff GOLD RIVER HOLDING LLC filed suit against Defendants YING
(CHRISTINE) LU, an individual; HAITAO (RICHARD) WU for damages for breach of a
commercial lease. Plaintiff alleges that the damages include lost rental income
at the rate of $36,490 per month during the five months required to make the
Premises rentable again (total exceeding $182,450) and incurred costs and
expenses exceeding $21,610 to repair the Premises so it could be relet.
On January
25, 2024, Defendants filed their answer.
On February
29, 2024, Defendants filed their first amended answer.
On September
23, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant motion.
On October 2,
2024, Defendants filed their opposition.
On October 4,
2024, Plaintiff filed its reply.
Discussion
The court
need not engage the merits of the motion at this juncture as no notice of
related case has been filed. The complaint references the UD action entitled
Gold River Holding LLC v Lu Ying and Wu Haitao (LASC case no: 23PSCV02543)
that was filed on 8/21/23.[1]
Pursuant to California Rules of Court Rule 3.300 [Related Case], “[w]henever a party in a civil action knows or learns that
the action or proceeding is related to another action or proceeding pending, dismissed,
or disposed of by judgment in any state or federal court in California, the
party must serve and file a Notice of Related Case.” (CRC Rule 3.300, subd.
(a), emphasis added.) Here, a review of the 23PSCV02543 case (West Covina
Courthouse/Dept 6), indicates that the case was dismissed by Plaintiff. (See
1/12/2024 Filing.) When, such as here, the case involves the same parties and
similar or identical claims, a notice of related case must be filed; however,
neither party has done so. Therefore, the court requests Plaintiff make the
requisite filing.
Based thereon, the motion will not be heard at this time.
[1]
According to the 1/9/2024 ruling in that case, the Defendants’ (unopposed)
motion to set aside default and default judgment due to improper service of the
summons and complaint was granted such that the writ of possession issued on
9/14/23 was recalled and quashed.