Judge: Christian R. Gullon, Case: 23STCV16430, Date: 2024-03-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV16430 Hearing Date: March 4, 2024 Dept: O
Tentative Ruling
(1)
DEMURRER OF DEFENDANTS, THE INTERNATIONAL
CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC. AND CITY OF ANGELS INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH, TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT is MOOT because a first amended complaint (FAC)
was filed.
(2)
MOTION OF DEFENDANTS, THE INTERNATIONAL
CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC. and CITY OF ANGELS INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH TO
STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT is MOOT.
Background
This case arises out of allegations of childhood sexual
abuse. Plaintiffs SALUD GONZALEZ (“Salud”) and JOANA DIAZ (“Joana”) allege the
following against Defendants INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST, INC. (“ICOC”);
THE INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC. (“ICC”); CITY OF ANGELS INTERNATIONAL
CHRISTIAN CHURCH (“City of Angeles Church”); THOMAS (“KIP”) McKEAN; FERNANDO
SANCHEZ (“Sanchez”); SELINA ANN BOQUET (“Selina”); RICARDO GONZALEZ, an
individual; ALFREDO ALANIS (“Alfredo”): Beginning at the age of 4, Salud was sexually
assaulted by Sanchez, a teacher at Salud’s local ICOC Church. (See FAC p. 35.)
Even when Salud changed churches to ICC, she was sexually assaulted by Selina,
who ran the Chemical Recovery Program. (See FAC p. 36.) As for Joana, she
assaulted and molested for years by Alfredo, an ICOC and ICC member. (FAC pp.
38-42.)
On July 13, 2023, Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant
asserting the following causes of action (COAs):
On October 20, 2023, the court issued the following minute
order re: Notice of Related Case: “The Court finds that the following cases,
23STCV16430 and 23STCV24432, are related within the meaning of California Rules
of Court, rule 3.300(a). 23STCV16430 is the lead case. For good cause shown,
said cases are assigned to Judge Christian R. Gullón in
Department O at Pomona Courthouse South for all purposes.”
On January 26, 2023, Defendants the International Christian
Church, Inc. and City Of Angels International Christian Church filed the
instant demurrer with a motion to strike.
On February 20, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a first amended
complaint (FAC) alleging the same COAs against the same Defendants.
Discussion
As the demurrer and motion to strike are as to the original
complaint but on 2/20/23, Plaintiffs filed a FAC, which now serves as the operative
complaint, the demurrer and MTS are moot.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, the demurrer and MTS are moot.