Judge: Christopher K. Lui, Case: 21STCV20775, Date: 2023-11-15 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV20775 Hearing Date: January 17, 2024 Dept: 76
Pursuant to California Rule of Court
3.1308(a)(1), the Court does not desire oral argument on the motion addressed
herein. Counsel must contact the staff
in Department 76 to inform the Court whether they wish to submit on the
tentative, or to argue the matter. As
required by Rule 3.1308(a), any party seeking oral argument must notify ALL
OTHER PARTIES and the staff of Department 76 of their intent to appear and
argue.
Notice to Department 76 may be sent by email to
smcdept76@lacourt.org or telephonically at 213-830-0776.
Per Rule of Court 3.1308, if notice of intention
to appear is not given, the Court may adopt the tentative ruling as the final
ruling.
Motion To Deem Admitted Requests For Admission
Discussion
On April 10, 2023, the Court ordered Defendant Jasmine Fajardo to provide further responses to requests for admission as to Nos. 1, 14-22, 24-28, 31 and 32 but not as to No. 7.
Civ. Proc. Code, § 2033.290(e) provides:
(e) If a party then fails to obey
an order compelling further response to requests for admission, the court may
order that the matters involved in the requests be deemed admitted. In lieu of,
or in addition to, this order, the court may impose a monetary sanction under
Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010).
Although Defendant purportedly
served supplemental responses prior to the hearing on this motion, such responses
were not verified. (Reply Decl. of Cory D. Gould, ¶ 6; Opp Decl. of Robert A.
Orozco, Exh. 1.) “Unsworn responses are tantamount to no responses at all.
(Citation omitted.)” (Appleton v.
Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635-36.)
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions
against Defendant Jasmine Fajardo only is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $1,245
(3 hours at $395/hour plus $60 filing fee—see Gould Decl., ¶ 10.) Sanctions
are to be paid to Plaintiff’s counsel within 20 days.
Plaintiff’s request that the Court
call an evidentiary hearing regarding Fajardo's reappearance is DENIED. If Plaintiff
wishes to seek terminating sanctions due to Fajardo’s conduct, Plaintiff may
bring a noticed motion.