Judge: Christopher K. Lui, Case: 23STCV04105, Date: 2024-06-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV04105 Hearing Date: June 7, 2024 Dept: 76
Plaintiffs allege that they paid
rent to Defendant, who did not forward the rent to the property owner, leading
to Plaintiffs’ eviction.
Defendant Geoffrey Alan Harris Lichtman demurs to the Complaint and moves to strike portions thereof.
TENTATIVE RULING
Moving Defendant expressly
acknowledges that the parties did not meet and confer, but Defendant did not
present a declaration reflecting an attempt to meet and confer in accordance
with Civ. Proc. Code, § 430.41 and § 435.5.
Civ. Proc. Code, § 430.41 and §
435.5 do not apply to self represented parties only if they are incarcerated, or if the
proceeding is for forcible entry, forcible detainer, or unlawful detainer.
(Civ. Proc. Code, § 430.41(d)(1); § 435.5(d)(1)(also inapplicable to a SLAPP
motion or motion brought less than 30 days before trial.) None of those
situations apply here.
On
June 7, 2024, Defendant Lichtman submitted a Declaration indicating that he
attempted to contact Plaintiffs by telephone to meet and confer about the
punitive damages, which only pertains to the motion to strike, and fraud, which
is only part of the demurrer. Lichtman
does not indicate that he left a message for each Plaintiff regarding a meet
and confer effort.
More fundamentally, Plaintiff Vanessa Poydras filed a Declaration indicating that, not only did Defendant fail to meet and confer regarding this motion, but he also did not serve Plaintiff with the motions. This is consistent with the proof of service not indicating the method of service.
As
such, the hearing on the demurrer and motion to strike is CONTINUED to July 15, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.
Defendant is to properly serve Plaintiffs with the demurrer and motion to
strike and satisfy the meet and confer requirement set forth in Civ. Proc.
Code, § 430.41. Supplemental declaration reflecting compliance with this
Court’s order is due by July 8, 2024.