Judge: Christopher K. Lui, Case: 24STCV16147, Date: 2025-03-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV16147 Hearing Date: March 6, 2025 Dept: 76
Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Uber’s driver negligently
caused an accident which injured Plaintiffs.
Defendant
Johnny Poroj moves to compel responses to requests for production of documents
propounded upon Plaintiffs Leslie Yadira Cerda-Lopez and Tommie Lee Lofton, and
requests sanctions.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendant
Johnny Poroj’s motion to compel responses to requests for production of documents propounded upon Plaintiffs Leslie
Yadira Cerda-Lopez and Tommie Lee Lofton is GRANTED. Verified responses,
without objection, are due within 20 days.
Defendant’s request for
sanctions against Plaintiffs and their counsel of record, Law Offices of David
F. Issapour, jointly and severally, is GRANTED in the reduced amount of
$517.50.
Sanctions are to be paid to
Defendant’s counsel within 20 days.
ANALYSIS
Discussion
Motion To Compel
Responses To Requests For Production of Documents
Defendant
Johnny Poroj moves to compel responses to requests for production of documents
propounded upon Plaintiffs Leslie Yadira Cerda-Lopez and Tommie Lee Lofton, and
requests sanctions.
When a
party to whom an inspection demand is directed fails to respond, under Civ.
Proc. Coe, § 2031.300(b) a party making the demand may move for an order
compelling a response to the inspection demand. A party who fails to provide a
timely response waives any objection, including one based on privilege or work
product. (Civ. Proc. Code, § 2031.300(a).)
For a motion to compel initial responses, no meet and confer is
required. All that needs to be shown is
that a set of requests for production was properly served on the opposing
party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind
has been served. (See, e.g., Leach v. Sup. Ct. (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905-06.)
As of the date of this motion,
Plaintiff has failed to serve any responses to requests for production of
documents. (Declaration of Kimia Karami, ¶ 6.) As such, Defendant is entitled
to an order compelling responses.
The motion to compel responses to
requests for production is GRANTED. Verified responses, without objection, are
due within 20 days.
Defendant’s request for sanctions
against Plaintiffs and their counsel of record, Law Offices of David F.
Issapour, jointly and severally, is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $517.50
(1.5 hours at $340/hour—Declaration of Kimia Karami, ¶ 7.) The Court
Reservation Receipt does not show that a filing fee was paid, so it will not be
part of the sanctions.
Sanctions are to be paid to
Defendant’s counsel within 20 days.