Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 19STCV09817, Date: 2022-08-12 Tentative Ruling
All parties are
urged to meet and confer with all parties concerning this tentative ruling to
see if they can reach an agreed-upon resolution of their matter. If
you are able to reach an agreement, please notify the courtroom staff in
advance of the hearing if you wish to submit on the tentative ruling rather
than argue the motion by notifying the court by e-mailing the court at: SSCDEPT28@lacourt.org. Include
the word "SUBMITS" in all caps and the Case Number in the Subject
line. In the body of the email, please provide the date and time of the
hearing, your name, your contact information, the party you represent, and
whether that party is a plaintiff, defendant, cross-complainant,
cross-defendant, claimant, intervenor, or non-party, etc.
Please be
advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the
hearing, the opposing party may still appear at the hearing and argue the
matter, and the court could change its tentative based upon the
argument. Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in
the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue.
If you submit, but still intend to appear, include the words "SUBMITS, BUT
WILL APPEAR" in the Subject line. If you elect to
argue your matter, you are urged to do so remotely, via Court-Connect.
Note that once the Court has issued a tentative, the Court has the inherent
authority not to allow the withdrawal of a motion and to adopt the tentative
ruling as the order of the court.
If you submitted a courtesy copy of
your papers containing media (such as a DVD or thumb drive), unless you request
the return of the media in your papers, the court will destroy it following the
hearing of your matter.
Case Number: 19STCV09817 Hearing Date: August 12, 2022 Dept: 28
Defendants
Luis Quintero and Tom Gores’s Motion to Compel Third Party Barbara Foley, Ph.D.
to Comply with Deposition Subpoena for Records
Having
considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
March 21, 2019, Plaintiff Marilyn Silver Lerman (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendants Luis Quintero (“Quintero”), Tom Gores (“Tom”) and Holly
Gores (“Holly”) for motor vehicle negligence and general negligence.
On
May 1, 2019, Quitero filed an answer.
On
September 16, 2019, Tom filed an answer and a Cross-Complaint against Moes 1 to
25 for breach of written contract, express indemnity, total equitable
indemnity, partial equitable indemnity, contribution and repayment, declaratory
relief and negligence.
On
June 10, 2022, Tom and Quintero (“Defendants”) filed a Motion to Compel Third
Party Barbara Foley, Ph.D.’s Compliance with Business Records Subpoena to be
heard on August 12, 2022.
Trial
is currently set for December 19, 2022.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Defendants
request the Court order Third Party Barbara Foley, Ph.D. (“Foley”) to produce
the subpoenaed records and pay $1,260.00 in sanctions to Defendants.
LEGAL
STANDARD
If
a deponent fails to answer any question or produce any document, the party
seeking discovery may move the court for an order compelling that answer or
production. CCP § 2025.480. A plaintiff may serve a deposition notice without
leave of court on any date that is 20 days after the service of the summons on,
or appearance by, any defendant. CCP § 2025.210. A deposition subpoena for only
the production of records shall command compliance on a date no earlier than 20
days after issuance or 15 days after service, whichever date is later. CCP §
2020.410.
The Court may impose monetary sanctions
against any party, person, or attorney engaging in the misuse of the discovery
process. (CCP § 2023.030(a).)
DISCUSSION
Defendants
provided proper notice and service of the motion on Foley.
Plaintiff
indicated that she sought treatment from Dr. Barbara Foley as a result of the
incident. Defendants served a subpoena on Foley on November 20, 2019, with a
production date of December 6, 2019. Foley did not object to the production
until March 10, 2020, citing that the records were confidential and privileged.
Defendants provided Foley with authorization from Plaintiff herself indicating
the requested records could be produced; Foley responded approximately 2 months
later indicating that the records had been destroyed, despite Foley being
mandated to keep Plaintiff’s records for 7 years following her treatment.
Defendants attempted to meet and confer in July of 2021 but received no
response. As the records appear to be
relevant to the treatment of Plaintiff’s injuries and Plaintiff has granted
explicit permission, the Court grants the motion ordering compliance with the
outfit.
Defendants
request the Court impose sanctions on Foley totaling $1,260.00 for failure to
comply with the subpoena and misuse of the discovery process. Given that Foley
was required to hold onto records beyond the time Foley claimed the records
were destroyed, the Court finds that Foley has misused the discovery process,
either in destroying or refusing to produce the requested records. The request
amount is based upon 4 hours of attorney’s work, at a rate of $175.00 per hour,
one $60.00 filling fee, and the identified $500.00 fee for failing to comply
with the subpoena. The Court finds this request reasonable and grants it in
full.
CONCLUSION
Defendants
Luis Quintero and Tom Gores’s Motion to Compel Third Party Barbara Foley, Ph.D.
to Comply with Deposition Subpoena for Records is GRANTED. Foley is ordered to
produce all responsive documents within 30 days of the hearing on the motion.
Defendants
Luis Quintero and Tom Gores’s Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. Foley is
ordered to pay Defendants sanctions totaling $1,260.00 within 30 days of the
hearing on this motion.
Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to
file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties
are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.