Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 19STCV45593, Date: 2022-08-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV45593 Hearing Date: August 16, 2022 Dept: 28
Petition to Approve Compromise of
Pending Action on Behalf of Minor Eddie Maestas filed by Petitioner Martha
Priscila Benavides Nolasco
Having considered the petitioning and motioning papers, the
Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On December 17, 2019, Plaintiff John Doe, by and through his
guardian ad litem Martha Priscila Benavides Nolasco, filed this action against
Defendant City of Los Angeles (“City”) and Baker Boys Distribution, Inc.
(“BBD”) for negligence and premises liability.
On March 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed the FAC, changing both
causes of action to negligence.
On May 15, 2020 The City filed an answer and a
Cross-Complaint against Cross-Defendant BBD for indemnification, apportionment
of fault and declaratory relief. On August 20, 2020, BBD filed an answer. The
City later dismissed the Cross-Complaint, with prejudice.
On September 28, 2020, BBD filed an answer.
On July 8, 2022, Petitioner Martha Priscila Benavides
Nolasco (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise to be
heard on August 16, 2022.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Petitioner Martha Priscila Benavides
Nolasco asks the Court to approve the compromise of the pending action on
behalf of Plaintiff Eddie
Maestas.
DISCUSSION
Petitioner
stated there was $7,880.07 in medical expenses, but that $0.00 is to be paid
from the proceeds. $1,863.08 was paid by a plan, with a reduction resulting in
total reimbursement to the plan totaling $1,076.66. There is no explanation for
the unaccounted for $6,000.00 in medical expenses and why no amount of the
proceeds will be used to reimburse medical expenses. Later, in section 17(b),
Petitioner notes that medical expenses to be reimbursed total $1,076.66. The
petition directly contradicts itself.
Based
on the above, the Court rejects the application.
CONCLUSION
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor Eddie Maestas filed by
Petitioner Martha Priscila Benavides Nolasco is DENIED.
Petitioner is ordered to give notice
of this ruling.
Petitioner is ordered to
file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties
are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.