Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 20STCV25842, Date: 2022-12-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV25842 Hearing Date: December 20, 2022 Dept: 28
Defendants
John William Bettencourt and John Bettencourt’s Motion for Change of Venue
Having considered the moving papers,
the Court rules as follows. 
BACKGROUND
On
July 10, 2020, Plaintiff Michael Love (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
Defendants John William Bettencourt (“J.W.B.”) and John Bettencourt (“J.B.”)
for motor vehicle negligence and general negligence. 
On
September 15, 2022, Defendants filed an answer. 
On
November 2, 2022, Defendants filed a Motion for Change of Venue to be heard on
December 20, 2022. 
Trial
is currently scheduled for August 11, 2023.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Defendants
request the Court order a transfer for venue to the Superior Court of the State
of California, Merced County, as it is the proper venue for this case.
LEGAL
STANDARD
Under
CCP § 395, the correct venue for an action is the superior court in the county
where some of defendants reside at the commencement of the action or where the
injury occurs. 
Under
CCP § 397(c), 
The
court may, on motion, change the place of trial in the following cases:
(a)
When the court designated in the complaint is not the proper court.
(b)
When there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein.
(c)
When the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by
the change.
(d)
When from any cause there is no judge of the court qualified to act.
DISCUSSION
The
underlying incident occurred in Merced County; Defendants were and still are
residents of Merced County. Based on that information, Los Angeles County is not
a proper venue for the case. Merced County, however, is. All Defendants reside
in Merced and the subject incident occurred in Merced. The Court grants the
motion.
CONCLUSION
Defendants
John William Bettencourt and John Bettencourt’s Motion for Change of Venue is
GRANTED. The action is transferred to the Superior Court of the State of
California, Merced County.  Plaintiff is ordered
to pay any transfer fees.
            Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this
ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.