Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 20STCV36312, Date: 2023-03-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV36312 Hearing Date: March 1, 2023 Dept: 28
Defendants
Admiral Pest Control, Inc and Anthony Lee Bearden’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff
Amy Melissa Mata’s Independent Medical Exams
Having considered the moving,
opposing and reply papers, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
September 23, 2020, Plaintiff Amy Melissa Mata (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
agianst Defendants Admiral Pest Control, Inc (“APC”) and Anthony Lee Bearden
(“Bearden”) for negligence and negligence per se.
On
October 23, 2020, Defendants filed an answer.
On
February 3, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s IMEs to be
heard on March 1, 2023. On February 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. On
February 22, 2023, Defendants filed a reply.
Trial
is currently scheduled for May 2, 2023.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Defendants request the Court order
Plaintiff to attend an IME with neuropsychiatrist James Rosenberg, M.D., and neuropsychologist
Ari Kalechstein, Ph.D., on April 5, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. at Executive Mental
Health, Inc. Located at 11835 W. Olympic Blvd., East Tower, 12th Floor
1265E, Los Angeles, CA 90064. Defendants also request the Court order Plaintiff
to pay $4,350.00 in sanctions.
Plaintiff requests the Court deny
the motion and grant Plaintiff sanctions totaling $2,000.00.
LEGAL STANDARD
A
defendant may demand one physical examination of the plaintiff in applicable
personal injury cases, so long as the examination is not pain or intrusive and
within 75 miles of the examinee’s place of residence. Code of Civil Procedure §
2032.220. Within 20 days of being served with the demand, the plaintiff served
will respond either with intent to comply or refuse, and if the latter, provide
reasons for the refusal. CCP § 2032.230.
Code
of Civil Procedure §2032.310 (a) requires a party to obtain leave of court if
it wishes to obtain discovery by an additional physical exam or any mental
exam. Subdivision (b) provides that a motion shall “...specify the time, place,
manner, conditions, scope, and nature of the examination, as well as the
identity and the specialty, if any, of the person or persons who will perform
the examination. The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer
declaration under Section 2016.040.” Such a motion may only be granted on good
cause shown. (CCP §2032.320(a).)
California
Code of Civil Procedure § 2023.030(a) provides that “[t]he court may impose a
monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery
process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable
expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that
conduct.” According to CCP §2023.010(d), misuse of the discovery process
includes “failing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of
discovery.”
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff
alleges that as a result of the subject incident, Plaintiff sustained injuries to
her neck, shoulder, back and right leg, as well as symptoms consistent with a
TBI. Plaintiff’s subpoenaed records reflect Plaintiff’s neurological complaints
include neurocognitive deficits and behavioral problems, PTSD, adjustment disorder,
mixed anxiety and other forms of visual and auditory injuries. Plaintiff has
put her neurological state at issue.
On
February 15, 2022, the Court granted leave for Defendants’ to serve Plaintiff
with a demand for IME with Dr. Rosenberg. Defendants set the date for November
21, 2022, providing over 100 days-notice to Plaintiff of the upcoming date.
Plaintiff failed to respond, object or give notice of her intent not to appear,
and then failed to appear.
Plaintiff
argues that the Court only granted leave for Dr. Rosenberg to take Plaintiff’s
IME. By including Dr. Kalchenstein as well, Defendants have not abided by the Court
order. Defendants argue that Plaintiff’s counsel originally stated they would
allow Plaintiff to sit for an exam with either Dr. Kalchenstein or Dr.
Rosenberg. Based on that representation, Defendants selected Dr. Kalechstein as
their ‘voluntarily agreed-upon' choice and filed the Motion to Compel for Dr.
Rosenberg.
The
Court disagrees with Defendants. There is no indication that parties agreed to
an IME with Dr. Kalchenstein prior to the filing of the Motion to Compel that would
indicate Plaintiff was on notice that this alleged offer had been accepted. In
the absence of evidence of confirmation or agreement, it is reasonable to
assume that Plaintiff’s may have interpreted Defendants’ motion as Defendants
‘choosing’ Dr. Rosenberg. There is no evidence that parties agreed to Dr.
Kalchenstein’s IME, nor is there any granting of leave from the Court. The
Court’s Feburary 15, 2022, minute order does not discuss the fact there was
another agreed to IME with a specialist in the same field, which is common when
the Court is deliberating on whether IMEs may be unduly cumulative. It does not
appear that either Plaintiff or the Court assumed that Dr. Kalchenstein’s IME
had been stipulated to prior to the ruling. Plaintiff’s opposition simply notes
they had agreed to one IME, and the attached exhibit indicates they were
willing to undergo one with either doctor. Presumably, that means that
any agreement to one would be revoked upon the Court granting leave for the
other. Therefore, the Court will only grant the motion as to Dr. Rosenberg.
The
Court will not award sanctions as both parties have misused the discovery
process. Defendants wrongfully noticed an IME for a doctor that was not agreed
upon or ordered by the Court. Plaintiff wrongfully failed to object to the IME
or provide notice that Plaintiff did not intend to appear.
CONCLUSION
Defendants
Admiral Pest Control, Inc and Anthony Lee Bearden’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Amy Melissa Mata’s Independent
Medical Exams is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff is ordered to appear for an IME
with neuropsychiatrist James Rosenberg, M.D., on April 5, 2023, at 10:30 a.m.
at Executive Mental Health, Inc. Located at 11835 W. Olympic Blvd., East Tower,
12th Floor 1265E, Los Angeles, CA 90064. The motion is denied as to
neuropsychologist Ari Kalechstein, Ph.D.
Defendants
Admiral Pest Control, Inc and Anthony Lee Bearden’s Request for Sanctions is
DENIED.
Plaintiff Amy Melissa Mata’s Request for Sanctions is
DENIED.
Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this
ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.