Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 20STCV46901, Date: 2022-09-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV46901 Hearing Date: September 27, 2022 Dept: 28
Defendant Chan Vinh Nguyen’s Motion
to Continue Trial
Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as
follows.
BACKGROUND
On December 8, 2020, Plaintiffs Chona A. Chua (“Chona”) and
Fernando Y. Chia (“Fernando”) filed this complaint against Defendant Chan Vinh
Nguyen (“Defendant”) for motor vehicle negligence.
Defendant filed his answer on August 5, 2021.
On August 24, 2022, Defendant filed a Motion to Continue
Trial, to be heard on September 27, 2022.
Trial is currently scheduled for February
3, 2023.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Defendant requests the Court continue trial 5 months, to
July 10, 2023.
LEGAL
STANDARD
CRC
rule 3.1332(b) outlines that “a party seeking a continuance of the date set for
trial, whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must
make the request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex parte
application under the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting
declarations. The party must make the motion or application as soon as
reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is discovered.”
Under
CRC 3.1332(c), The Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing
of good cause requiring the continuance. Circumstances that may indicate good
cause include “a party's excused inability to obtain essential testimony,
documents, or other material evidence despite diligent efforts.” The Court
should consider all facts and circumstances relevant to the determination, such
as proximity of the trial date, prior continuances, prejudice suffered, whether
all parties have stipulated to a continuance, and whether the interests of
justice are served. CRC 3.1332(d).
CRC 3.110(b) requires service of the
complaint upon all named defendants within 60 days of filing the complaint with
the court. The Court’s First Amended Standing Order re Personal Injury
Procedures at the Spring Street Courthouse (effective February 24, 2020)
provides that “The Court Sets the above trial and final status conference dates
on the condition that plaintiff(s) effectuate service of defendant(s) of the
summons and complaint within six months of filing the complaint.”
DISCUSSION
Defendant argues that, despite diligent efforts, he has been
unable to obtain the deposition testimony of Chua; this has prevented Defendant
from filing any further discovery or request for medical examinations. Chua’s
deposition cannot take place until late November, which Defendant argues is too
close to the current trial date.
Plaintiffs’ counsel has stated he is unavailable until July
2023, should any continuance be granted. Parties have stipulated to this
continuance.
CONCLUSION
Defendant Chan Vinh Nguyen’s Motion to Continue Trial is
GRANTED. Trial is continued to July 17, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 28 of
the Spring Street Courthouse. The Final Status Conference is July 3, 2023, at
10:00 a.m. in Department 28 of the Spring Street Courthouse. All discovery and
related dates are set to trail the new trial date.
Moving party is ordered to give
notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to
file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties
are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.