Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 21STCV01782, Date: 2023-02-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV01782 Hearing Date: February 17, 2023 Dept: 28
Defendant
Jaeger Sports Academy, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Physical
Exam
Having considered the moving papers,
the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
January 15, 2021, Plaintiff Elliott Layne (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendant Jaeger Sports Academy, Inc. (“JSA”) for general negligence
and products liability. Plaintiff amended the complaint to include Defendants
SML, Inc. (“SML”) and Vassar College (“Vassar”).
On
March 3, 2021, JSA filed an answer and the Cross-Complaint against
Cross-Defendant SML for indemnity, contribution and apportionment, and
declaratory relief. JSA amended the Cross-Complaint to include Cross-Defendant
Vassar. On May 24, 2021, SML filed an answer. On March 18, 2022, Vassar filed
an answer.
On
December 30, 2021, SML filed an answer.
On
July 5, 2022, Vassar filed an answer.
On
November 15, 2022, JSA filed a Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Physical
Exam to be heard on February 17, 2023.
Trial
is currently set for January 23, 2024.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
JSA requests the Court compel
Plaintiff to appears for an independent mental exam with ophthalmologist Alena
Reznik, MD, Glaucoma Care Center, 1401 Avocado Avenue, Suite 302, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
LEGAL STANDARD
Code
of Civil Procedure §2032.310 (a) requires a party to obtain leave of court if
it wishes to obtain discovery by an additional physical exam or any mental
exam. Subdivision (b) provides that a motion shall “...specify the time, place,
manner, conditions, scope, and nature of the examination, as well as the
identity and the specialty, if any, of the person or persons who will perform
the examination. The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer
declaration under Section 2016.040.” Such a motion may only be granted on good
cause shown. (CCP §2032.320(a).)
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff alleges that, as a result
of the subject incident, he has suffered from injuries to his eye and may
develop glaucoma. Plaintiff testified at his deposition he had been told he was
at a high risk of glaucoma due to said injuries. Plaintiff has put potential injuries and symptoms at
issue that an ophthalmologist could evaluate, meaning there is good cause for
such an IME.
JSA
has provided the time, place, manner, conditions, scope, and nature of the
examination, as well as the identity and specialty of the person to perform the
examination. The Court grants the motion. JSA’s initial time for the exam has
passed, so the Court orders parties to set an exam for the next 30 days.
CONCLUSION
Defendant
Jaeger Sports Academy, Inc.’s
Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Physical Exam is GRANTED. Plaintiff is
ordered to appear for an independent mental exam with ophthalmologist, Alena
Reznik, MD, Glaucoma Care Center, 1401 Avocado Avenue, Suite 302, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, within 30 days of the hearing on the motion.
Moving party is ordered to give
notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this
ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.