Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 21STCV18236, Date: 2023-03-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV18236 Hearing Date: March 10, 2023 Dept: 28
Defendants
Rojin Erfan, DDS, Walter Jefferson, DDS and Jefferson and Kim dba PCH Smiles
Dentistry and Orthodontics s’s Motion to Continue Trial
Having
considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
May 14, 2021, Plaintiff Homa Deris (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
Defendants Byron Kim, DDS (“Kim”), Rojin Erfan, DDS (“Erfan”), Walter
Jefferson, DDS (“Jefferson”), Jefferson and Kim dba PCH Smiles Dentistry and
Orthodontics (“PCH”), Kevin Choi, DDS (“Choi”) and Bardi-Nugent Dental
Corporation dba Rootvision Endo (“Rootvision”) for dental malpractice,
fraudulent concealment, inattentional misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary
duty and elder abuse.
On
October 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed the FAC.
On
February 2, 2022, Kim, Jefferson and PCH filed an answer. On March 16, 2022,
Choi filed an answer. On January 13, 2023, Rootvision filed an answer. On
January 25, 2023, Erfan filed an answer.
On February 8, 2023, Kim, Jefferson
and PCH (“Moving Defendants”) filed a Motion to Continue Trial to be heard on
March 10, 2023. Parties later filed a stipulation to continue trial.
Trial
is scheduled for May 18, 2023.
PARTY’S
REQUESTS
Moving
Defendants requests the Court continue trial to March 25, 2024.
LEGAL STANDARD
CRC
rule 3.1332(b) outlines that “a party seeking a continuance of the date set for
trial, whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must
make the request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex parte
application under the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting
declarations. The party must make the motion or application as soon as
reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is discovered.”
Under
CRC 3.1332(c), The Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing
of good cause requiring the continuance. Circumstances that may indicate good
cause include “a party's excused inability to obtain essential testimony,
documents, or other material evidence despite diligent efforts,” or the
unavailability of a party, counsel, or expert due to death, illness or other
excusable circumstance. The Court should consider all facts and circumstances
relevant to the determination, such as proximity of the trial date, prior
continuances, prejudice suffered, whether all parties have stipulated to a
continuance, and whether the interests of justice are served. CRC 3.1332(d).
DISCUSSION
Moving
Defendants request the Court continue trial so that their MSJ may be heard
prior to trial. Trial is scheduled for May 18, 2023; in order for the MSJ to be
heard prior to the current trial date, the MSJ must be heard by April 18, 2023.
For the MSJ to be heard by that date, it needed to be served by February 2,
2023. The MSJ was filed on January 27, 2023, before the required date of
service. All parties
have stipulated to the request, indicating that no parties would be prejudiced
by this continuance. The Court finds good cause and grants a continuance. Nonetheless, the Court finds the length of the requested continuance too long.
CONCLUSION
Defendants
Rojin Erfan, DDS, Walter Jefferson, DDS and Jefferson and Kim dba PCH Smiles
Dentistry and Orthodontics s’s Motion to Continue Trial is GRANTED. Trial is
continued to December 11, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 28 of the Spring Street
Courthouse. The Final Status Conference is November 27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. in
Department 28 of the Spring Street Courthouse. All discovery and related dates are
set to trail the new trial date.
Moving party is ordered to give
notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this
ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.