Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 22STCV01902, Date: 2023-02-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV01902 Hearing Date: February 27, 2023 Dept: 28
Plaintiff Kelley Brown’s Motion to
Consolidate Cases
Having considered the moving papers,
the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
January 14, 2022, Plaintiff Tarzana Treatment Centers, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed
this action against Defendant Steve Lyons (“Steve”) for motor vehicle
negligence. Plaintiff later amended the complaint to include Defendant Gabriela
Lyons (“Gabriela”).
On
April 14, 2022, Steve filed an answer. On November 4, 2022, Gabriela filed an
answer.
On
June 13, 2022, the Court deemed this case and case no. 22STCV01140 related.
On
December 20, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Consolidate to be heard on February
27, 2023.
Trial
is current scheduled for July 14, 2023.
PARTY’S
REQUESTS
Plaintiff
requests the Court consolidate this case with Case No. 22STCV01140 entitled Darlene
Henderson v. Steve Lyons, et al.
LEGAL
STANDARD
According
to CCP § 1048, when actions involved a common question or law or fact, it may
order a joint hearing or trial, or order all actions consolidated.
Los
Angeles County Superior Court Local Rule 3.3(g) provides as follows: “(1) Cases
may not be consolidated unless they are in the same department. A motion to
consolidate two or more cases may be noticed and heard after the cases,
initially filed in different departments, have been related into a single
department, or if the cases were already assigned to that department. (2) Upon
consolidation of cases, the first filed case will be the lead case, unless
otherwise ordered by the court. After consolidation, all future papers to be
filed in the Consolidated case must be filed only in the case Designated as the
lead case”
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff
alleges that both cases arise out of the incident and involve common parties to
the action. Both cases stem from an automobile accident on January 16, 2020, in
which Defendant allegedly rear-ended a vehicle operated by Plaintiff’s employee
while working for Plaintiff. The other action is by the employee herself. Defendant
is identified as the defendant in both cases. They have the same basic questions
of fact or law. The cases were deemed related on June 13, 2022. It is within
the interest of judicial economy to consolidate these actions. As such, the
Court grants the motion.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiff
Tarzana Treatment Centers, Inc.’s Motion to Consolidate Cases is GRANTED. Case
No. 22STCV01902 and Case No. 22STCV01140 are consolidated, with Case No. 22STCV01140
designated as the lead case.
Moving Party is ordered to give notice of this
ruling.
Moving
Party is ordered to file the
proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for
further instructions.